Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bielefeld, Germany
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Exclamation Webnauts Net would appreciate review

    I am tweaking permanently my web site http://www.webnauts.net for its markup, accessibility, seo and usability.

    Here I would appreciate if you would have a look, and tell me honestly what you think about it, and if something to your opinion is not well done, please be so kind and drop me a line. You may invite me too to review your site if you wish.

    Thanks in advance for your kind support.

  • #2
    Senior Coder NancyJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bradford, UK
    Posts
    3,174
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 66 Times in 65 Posts
    http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos....webnauts.net/
    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v....webnauts.net/

    Also your access keys are hard to find and are very limited (only 6 in the whole site according to your access keys page) Also I shouldnt have to hunt to find them.
    The colours are harsh togther (bright orange and purple)
    In your source code the content should be at the top for various reasons.
    Your nav should stand out from your content more. I dont like the 'highlight' effect on your hovers either, they're a little sloppy when links go onto multiple lines.
    The background on your headers is too low contrast with the rest of the page.
    The page content is too wide (accessibility concern, particularly for dyslexics)

    Overall the look is very flat, the 'design' does nothing to lead my eye to anything in particular or any heirarchical structure.
    The extremely long IDs are just unnecessary.

    While you might think this is a little harsh and who the hell am I, my site isnt perfect either...etc Well my site isnt offering SOE, accessibility and usability training. With site content as yours is, you should expect harsh criticism where flaws are found.

  • #3
    Regular Coder Crake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Loose, Maidstone, KENT
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    hmmm looks ok...nothing specials to be honest you see alot of sites like that but what is different is those little bars in the content area dont like them

    its good code one error well done
    SteveO

  • #4
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bielefeld, Germany
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Thumbs up Thanks a lot

    NancyJ and Crake thanks for you kind review, and especially for pointing out that error. It happen yesterday when I added the link to "Wordtracker".

    Pages XHTML validate again. http://www.htmlhelp.com/cgi-bin/vali...amp;spider=yes
    About the CSS issues we are working on them.

    Best,

    John


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •