Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.

View Poll Results: AcademyStudios.com is...

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • not a pleasant and enjoyable web experience

    3 50.00%
  • not that bad, but not that great for me to want to come back.

    2 33.33%
  • fantastic.

    1 16.67%
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    User Input for an old site -- what do you and don't you like?

    http://www.academystudios.com

    This is an older site that my company had designed before my time -- currently I am in the stages of redesign. A new site will be XHTML 100%tableless, CSS positioning -- so please don't post about the code, believe me, I know

    What I would like to know is what you don't like, and what you do like about this older site. Many people strongly dislike it, many love it.
    How do you feel about the overall look? The images? The color Scheme? The Navigation (not only look, but functionality)?

    What would keep you visiting? Current articles written from our designers? A blog about the industry and techniques? Interactive animation of the processes and walk throughs of the museums?

    Feel free to let go -- the more rough and in-depth you are, the better we have to make a site that is not only accessible to all users, but enjoyable to boot.

    Please also add any ideas that I have not listed, which you think would be cool to have, or need to be dropped.

    Thanks to everyone who posts -- your help won't go unnoticed, and I'll do what I can to promote your ideas, and your talents. You'll get a nice special link and blurb on my home site when I have it completed in the next week or so for this one
    Last edited by bradyj; 06-08-2004 at 10:01 PM.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #2
    Senior Coder gsnedders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,340
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    I'ld get rid of the silvery bar below the navbar and the photos.

  • #3
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I personally really like it, and I like the shadow underneath the navbar and the photos. What I dont like is the contact information. It looks somewhat out of place. The front page also makes me scroll down a heck of a lot to get to the copyright notice. (im not saying its a long scroll, just a long scroll just to get to the copyright). Its also the same with the client area. I have to scroll down alot to get to the copyright...
    The colour scheme is nice. Some of the images take a while to load. I am using Cable and it took about 10 seconds for the new images to load (the top images by the navbar... especially when they change to a different image)

    Im not really sure that I would come back. I would probably come back once or twice, then stop.
    Quote Originally Posted by bradyj
    What would keep you visiting? Current articles written from our designers? A blog about the industry and techniques? Interactive animation of the processes and walk throughs of the museums?
    I never did find those articles, the blog, or the animations...
    Those would have been the things that make me come back more than once or twice.
    Other than that, its great work!

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by l3vi
    I personally really like it, and I like the shadow underneath the navbar and the photos. What I dont like is the contact information. It looks somewhat out of place. The front page also makes me scroll down a heck of a lot to get to the copyright notice. (im not saying its a long scroll, just a long scroll just to get to the copyright). Its also the same with the client area. I have to scroll down alot to get to the copyright...
    The colour scheme is nice. Some of the images take a while to load. I am using Cable and it took about 10 seconds for the new images to load (the top images by the navbar... especially when they change to a different image)

    Im not really sure that I would come back. I would probably come back once or twice, then stop.

    I never did find those articles, the blog, or the animations...
    Those would have been the things that make me come back more than once or twice.
    Other than that, its great work!
    Are you talking about my test redesign? If so, I probably wasn't that clear -- I want to know what you do and don't like about the older site:
    http://www.academystudios.com

    So I can make sure I design the new one better. That new link is just to prove that the code will be fully accessible

    However, the input for that was helpful -- a blog and animation, etc. has not been setup; I'm just wondering if you guys would like it.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #5
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Oh, lol.. oops...

    Well, I really dont like the colour scheme much. I dont really like dark grey and orange mixed... and the red.
    I also dont like the marble texture image above the black bar that Academy studios. The layout is very nice, but I also think that the main content should be placed in the center of the screen, instead of on the left, with a gigantic grey block on the right side.
    The contact information should be aligned on the left, not the right, IMO.
    Maybe you could switch to a green and silver colour scheme, with some orange, or the other way around (silver and orange, with a little green). It would probably blend with the logo a little better.
    I think the current colours are a little too dark.

    I do like the watermark in the background of the text. It looks reall nice, although it is somewhat distracting. Maybe make it a bit lighter.

    As for the blog, etc. That would be really nice. THat would be the thing that would keep me coming. Right now I probably wouldnt keep coming.

    Still, its good work!

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    545
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Can I ask what the general purpose of this site is?My thoughts on the old site:
    • layout/colors not bad
    • The text through out the site is pretty bland. I think more typography could be used especially in the introduction since this is the first page they see.
    • I am unsure on why there artwork is not present through out the site. Like the "who we are" page is boring and really doesnt do much to keep a persons attention.
    • On the menu the "Who we Are" appears to have a list of menu items below but I do not see a correlation.
    • Some of the menu items do not have the same page title (e.g. menu item-capabilities : page title-"services"
    • The tour is bad it takes way to many clicks. It should be better organized. There is no flow like an actual tour.
    • Client listing is showing way too much. I would break this up and highlight the most popular or well known with the option to view all. LOL I just realized that was a partial list too.
    • Portfolio and Client page...I am not sure if there is a need for both
    • On the contact form why are some fields blue...there is nothing there defining why. I really dont like long voluntary forms but if they need all that information you dont have a choice. I would not make it entirely horizontal to change the perception of its length.
    • The people page is good.


    Overall it is a good site. On the pages that a possible client might see I think there should be more to grab their attention. The layout is ok but it really locks in the size of images you can use to show off their work.
    does this sig match?

  • #7
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The general purpose is to showcase the company of Academy Studios - what they create, and their corporate culture.

    To answer some questions here:
    1. I did not design the old site. This was done before my time, so I can't vouche for why they did what they did. I just want to know what doesn't work and what you recommend.
    2. The redesign I posted is not meant to be a guide as the final design -- that was purely a sample to show how the code can be improved upon -- where we create the XHTML semantically correct, and use all presentation seamless CSS. Don't use this as a target -- in fact, I think I'll delete the link from the original.

    That being said, I agree with you 100% allida77 I think a new way of thinking needs to develop as to what this site needs to accomplish. It should be less of a basic info of the company, and more a marketing presentation of what they do.

    Please, everyone, keep posting and let me know what you like and don't like. Thanks everyone!
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #8
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
    Posts
    4,252
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Some remarks

    Overall, the design strikes me as rather pleasant; the menu looks pretty good, the colors feel good and the layout is fairly classic, but most fitting.

    The home page fails to make clear to me what Academy Studios is all about; a statement like "Experience discovery, wonder and magic" sounds very clever in a TV commercial, but as a tag line it says nothing.
    Try to find a clear, meaningful, short (Krug advises 6-8 words max.) statement that describes what AS does; I'm thinking: "Exhibition design and fabrication", and place it as a tag line onder the main header.

    I'd like to see a distinction in the menu between "normal" links (that link to a page) and expand-collapse links like "who we are".

    It's advisable to have the site logo/header double as "home" link, although the home link in the menu is always present and easy to find.

    The large dark strip down the right side is a nice design feature, but it strikes me as a waste of real estate; I'd strongly reduce its width, or get rid of it all together.

    The "capabilities" link under "Who we are" links to a page called "services"; it's advisable to name the links in accordance with the page titles. Calling the link "services" may be the better option here.

    Some texts are implemented as images, which may not be the best idea for the menu, and certainly isn't for the addresses and phone numbers below it.

    The body text on the other hand is rather bland and especially the headers could do with a little adornment. Making those a little catchier assists scanning and visually navigating the text.

    Those are some of my impressions; I hope you can benefit from them.
    Last edited by ronaldb66; 06-09-2004 at 09:09 AM.
    Regards,
    Ronald.
    ronaldvanderwijden.com


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •