Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37
  1. #1
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Exclamation Site Review: Googlebaba.com

    Hi


    I want you to take a look into my newly created site and tell me how useful it is to you. FYI, Its in BETA.


    Comments/Suggestions/Criticism is welcomed.


    http://www.googlebaba.com/



    PS: Not necessary but If you like the service, you can support us by visiting our sponsors.


    Thanx & Regards

  • #2
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    118
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Simple, but I guess that there really isn't a whole bunch to it.

    It didn't work when I tried it, but I know you said that it's in beta.

    One thing I'd say is that your image looked a little "grainy". So if you have photoshop, or something of the like, try using a blur tool on it to smooth it out a it.

    EDIT:

    http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l..._baba_logo.jpg

    Try that for your image, I did a quick surface Blur and it looks a lot better.



    Regards
    Last edited by peteyb383; 05-31-2008 at 06:25 PM.

  • #3
    Regular Coder BabyJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Somewhere.
    Posts
    602
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Can I just ask what the significance of this is?
    I know my page rank, first.

    *FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT WANT TO SEE ADULT / IMATURE WORDS, DO NOT CLICK*
    http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=wif...ient=firefox-a
    Enlightenment in Coding
    Validate before Posting | Google is your friend for PC Problems | Make sure you have a doctype

  • #4
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    in my house
    Posts
    5,211
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 201 Times in 197 Posts
    And here's the result I got when trying on the third occasion.

    Code:
    Parse error:  syntax error, unexpected T_IF in /home/cupid/public_html/googlebaba.com/validate.php on line 32
    I didn't type T_IF or indeed, any capitals, though I don't think that is what your error means anyway.

    hth

    bazz

  • #5
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Sorry about the error, i was working on somethng....should work now

  • #6
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    in my house
    Posts
    5,211
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 201 Times in 197 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BabyJack View Post
    Can I just ask what the significance of this is?
    I know my page rank, first.

    When you type in wifee I suppose you wil be first. ANy time I type one of my domains in, it always comes top, though qwuite why anyone would use google to find me if they already know my domain I don't know.

    I suupose if seo managers want to know what other keywords (guess words if you think about it), draw people to their site and how effectively those guess words do it. Maybe it may have a use for that? ALthough this program doesn't seem to do it yet. I know that for a set of keywords, my client's site comes up #3 but according to that site abogve, it doesn;t feature in the top '21'

    bazz
    bazz

  • #7
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bazz View Post
    When you type in wifee I suppose you wil be first. ANy time I type one of my domains in, it always comes top, though qwuite why anyone would use google to find me if they already know my domain I don't know.

    I suupose if seo managers want to know what other keywords (guess words if you think about it), draw people to their site and how effectively those guess words do it. Maybe it may have a use for that? ALthough this program doesn't seem to do it yet. I know that for a set of keywords, my client's site comes up #3 but according to that site abogve, it doesn;t feature in the top '21'

    bazz
    bazz
    Please PM me the sites which shows wrong info with my program with their respective keywords.

  • #8
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in Localhost...
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 42 Posts
    Well it worked fine for me. Told me I was rank 1 (which is true), quite helpful.
    Although the only bad thing I can say is that the banner/image/logo/thing looks really low quality.

  • #9
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Millenia View Post
    Well it worked fine for me. Told me I was rank 1 (which is true), quite helpful.
    Although the only bad thing I can say is that the banner/image/logo/thing looks really low quality.
    Thanx for the +ve feedback. The reason why the image quality is low because I wanted a light weight site as google

  • #10
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ, USA
    Posts
    685
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 46 Times in 46 Posts
    Technical:
    - I would prefer being able to do a new search without having to clear the old (ie it clears automatically)
    - Tables for layout, its such a simple design what a waste to use tables!
    - Tons of coding errors

    Design:
    - Logo's a little fuzzy

  • #11
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in Localhost...
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 42 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cancer10 View Post
    Thanx for the +ve feedback. The reason why the image quality is low because I wanted a light weight site as google
    Well if you want a more lightweight site, you have missed some basic principals:

    1. You have used tables for layout! Use CSS, tables consume much more bandwidth (look at my signature if you don't believe me )

    2. Lots of your code could be converted to CSS. So with the new CSS layout, it would go together and make it a few milliseconds faster and a a lot of bytes smaller .

  • #12
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Millenia View Post
    Well if you want a more lightweight site, you have missed some basic principals:

    1. You have used tables for layout! Use CSS, tables consume much more bandwidth (look at my signature if you don't believe me )

    2. Lots of your code could be converted to CSS. So with the new CSS layout, it would go together and make it a few milliseconds faster and a a lot of bytes smaller .
    ok thanx for your response. I just noticed that google.com is using tables instead of CSS. Why wont they do the layout in CSS instead?

  • #13
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in Localhost...
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 42 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cancer10 View Post
    ok thanx for your response. I just noticed that google.com is using tables instead of CSS. Why wont they do the layout in CSS instead?
    Because Google is silly. Google's source code has loads of errors.

    Sure it works fine and does the job but it doesn't comply with any of the W3 web standards and if they tried they could make their site even more lightweight.
    Edit: click my sig and read why not to use tables

  • Users who have thanked Millenia for this post:

    phantom007 (05-31-2008)

  • #14
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    892
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Millenia View Post
    Because Google is silly. Google's source code has loads of errors.

    Sure it works fine and does the job but it doesn't comply with any of the W3 web standards and if they tried they could make their site even more lightweight.
    Edit: click my sig and read why not to use tables
    You are right, loads of error on their site. LOL

    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v...ning=1&lang=en

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...Inline&group=0

  • #15
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in Localhost...
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 43 Times in 42 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cancer10 View Post
    Yup


  •  
    Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •