Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    805
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts

    Behrentzs.com new design!

    Hi guys.

    I have finally come up with a new design for my site. After gaining a lot of experience with xhtml, css and a little php & javascript I've come up with this.

    The site is tested in IE6 and FF and works fine for both. Please let me know what you think and if you have any ideas for improvements.

    AND, the site is not finished yet so links and other testcontent can be unavaible.

    Thanks,

    http://behrentzs.com/site/

  • #2
    Regular Coder BabyJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Somewhere.
    Posts
    602
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    :: The marquee colour and background do not fit well. I cannot see marquee, an extra thing is the marquee speed is too fast.

    :: The footer is a bit tacky

    :: The logo is amazing! Good creativity

    :: The top of the page is a bit ugly, because it goes from a dark to a light colour. Why not try a gradient halftoned background? It will look good like that.

    :: Time to celebrate! The first site on this forum that has passed validation! Validation!!!!

    Thats about it! The site is amazing! Love the creativity involved with it!


    BabYJack
    Enlightenment in Coding
    Validate before Posting | Google is your friend for PC Problems | Make sure you have a doctype

  • Users who have thanked BabyJack for this post:

    CaptainB (05-21-2008)

  • #3
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    805
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
    Good point about the marquee colors. The reason why it might not fit is because I'm at a laptop where the screen abviously is more bright. I will review this site on my other computer, thanks for pointing out.

    I will try the gradient instead - thanks for the suggestion!

    Thanks for your review, sir!

  • #4
    Regular Coder BabyJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Somewhere.
    Posts
    602
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Your Welcome =D
    Enlightenment in Coding
    Validate before Posting | Google is your friend for PC Problems | Make sure you have a doctype

  • #5
    The Apostate Apostropartheid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,215
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 265 Times in 263 Posts
    Don't use a marquee at all.

    I like it, but my main complaint is that you're using a typeface which does not anti-alias using MS ClearType, which makes it look awful. Also, shouldn't you make those validator icons links? ^^

  • Users who have thanked Apostropartheid for this post:

    CaptainB (05-22-2008)

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ, USA
    Posts
    685
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 46 Times in 46 Posts
    Technical:
    - Hooray! The XHTML validates! CSS doesn't, though.
    - You appear to be using flash for the logo, I don't know why. One time the flash didn't finish rendering for me, kind of annoying
    - Don't use marquee

    Do not create scrolling text with the marquee element.

    Do not use the marquee element to create scrolling text. There are several reasons for this:

    • Scrolling content can provide accessibility problems.
    • The marquee element is not part of the HTML specification.
    (from http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-W...50211/#marquee)

    Design:
    - Very nice graphics, especially the logo only one thing: IMO the "behrentzs" is a little fuzzy. But I'm just being extra-picky because I can't find anything else wrong!
    - Marquees are distracting and the color-contrast isn't good
    - IMO the "You are here:" is unnecessary; it already tells you where you are in the header. Either that or you could make it a breadcrumb trail, up to you

    Excellent-looking site!

  • Users who have thanked binaryWeapon for this post:

    CaptainB (05-22-2008)

  • #7
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    118
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Nice work,

    One thing however, to save loading time, bandwidth, and disk space for gallery photos; only store the large copies of the photos, then resize them using HTML on the gallery page. This way, they don't have to load in twice: one thumbnail, and large.

    Good job though.

  • #8
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    805
    Thanks
    123
    Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
    CyanLight, could you suggest a font which does anti-alias?
    Well, not intended to, but could be I should do.

    binaryWeapon, I know about the css. It isn't possible to make it validate though, as its the unsupported (by CSS2.1) opacity tags are needed for my design. I don't care though, as all the other important CSS is valid.

    The reason I'm using flash is because I'm dynamically loading different pictures from a folder into the banner. Each the time loads a new picture is displayed in the header.

    I already know about the marquee and I did research it. That's why I'm using a javascript which works in all major browsers. No <marquee> tag.

    Thank you guys for all your help and critique !

  • #9
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ, USA
    Posts
    685
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 46 Times in 46 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainB View Post
    binaryWeapon, I know about the css. It isn't possible to make it validate though, as its the unsupported (by CSS2.1) opacity tags are needed for my design. I don't care though, as all the other important CSS is valid.
    I've run into the exact same problem on my site, quite understandable.
    Last edited by binaryWeapon; 05-22-2008 at 02:58 PM. Reason: misspelling

  • #10
    eak
    eak is offline
    Regular Coder eak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    354
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 26 Times in 26 Posts

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by peteyb383 View Post
    Nice work,

    One thing however, to save loading time, bandwidth, and disk space for gallery photos; only store the large copies of the photos, then resize them using HTML on the gallery page. This way, they don't have to load in twice: one thumbnail, and large.

    Good job though.
    Are you kidding? That should never be done.
    eak | "Doing a good deed is like wetting your pants; every one can see the results, but only you can feel the warmth."

  • #11
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ, USA
    Posts
    685
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 46 Times in 46 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eak View Post
    Are you kidding? That should never be done.
    I would have to agree with that. Think about users with dial-up; they will have to wait several minutes to load a tiny thumbnail. However, even thumbnails will load quickly for dial-up (usually) and even for high-speed you'll see a noticeable difference. The thumbnails should be small enough that they don't unduly effect your bandwidth. I have about 50 thumbnails on my site, and all together they only take up 700kb of space. That's about 14kb per image, which isn't too bad.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •