Go Back   CodingForums.com > :: Client side development > General web building

Before you post, read our: Rules & Posting Guidelines

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Old 12-23-2005, 03:44 PM   PM User | #1
QBall777
Regular Coder

 
QBall777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
QBall777 is an unknown quantity at this point
800 by 600 site looks bad!

Hi

My website looks wrong when viewed in 800 by 600 screen resolution, but only in IE.

In Netscape and Mozilla it looks fine. I was told to use this js script but it didn't make any difference, does anyone know how to fix this problem?

Here is my url http://www.skiskool.com/

Thanks

java script code

//reload if NN4 resized
function ResizeReloadNN4(init)
{
if (init==true) with (navigator)
{
if (document.layers)
{
pageW = innerWidth;
pageH = innerHeight;
onresize = ResizeReloadNN4();
}
}
else if (innerWidth != pageW || innerHeight != pageH)
{
history.go(0);
}
}

ResizeReloadNN4(true);
QBall777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 09:21 PM   PM User | #2
felgall
Master Coder

 
felgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 503 Times in 494 Posts
felgall is a jewel in the roughfelgall is a jewel in the roughfelgall is a jewel in the rough
That Javascript is to fix a Netscape 4 bug. It will have no effect on any other browser.
__________________
Stephen
Learn Modern JavaScript - http://javascriptexample.net/
Helping others to solve their computer problem at http://www.felgall.com/
felgall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2005, 10:36 PM   PM User | #3
ecntrc
Regular Coder

 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: hawaii.washington state
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ecntrc is an unknown quantity at this point
I think your site looks fine on my screen, actually im not too sure what screen size I have.. but I think that it looks perfect.
ecntrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 12:13 AM   PM User | #4
Ranger56
Regular Coder

 
Ranger56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kent, WA.
Posts: 783
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ranger56 is an unknown quantity at this point
most sites look bad at 800x600, but most people have a higher resolution than that.
__________________
Ranger56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 03:11 AM   PM User | #5
oracleguy
Rockstar Coder


 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 9,042
Thanks: 1
Thanked 322 Times in 318 Posts
oracleguy is a jewel in the roughoracleguy is a jewel in the roughoracleguy is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger56
most sites look bad at 800x600, but most people have a higher resolution than that.
Actually I believe the current "standard" is 800x600 and by standard I mean the majority of people use it. But I'd imagine 1024 will take that over soon enough with lots of new computers coming with 15" LCDs now instead of CRTs and their native resolution being 1024.
__________________
OracleGuy
oracleguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 03:17 AM   PM User | #6
thesavior
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,119
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
thesavior has a little shameless behaviour in the past
i do a 1920 by 1200 res.

But i know what he is talking about, if you make the window small, the left nav jumps down underneath the center column.
thesavior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 12:14 PM   PM User | #7
QBall777
Regular Coder

 
QBall777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
QBall777 is an unknown quantity at this point
yes that's correct, the nav bar drops below the content, there must be a way to stop this from happening!!
QBall777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2005, 05:13 PM   PM User | #8
Scootertaj
Regular Coder

 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Scootertaj is an unknown quantity at this point
Give their width's percents
__________________
My Site
Scootertaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 09:57 PM   PM User | #9
Pennimus
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,051
Thanks: 6
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Pennimus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Actually I believe the current "standard" is 800x600 and by standard I mean the majority of people use it.
No, this isn't true. Most people are at 1024x768 -
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

Those stats are backed up by my own research.
Pennimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 08:17 PM   PM User | #10
felgall
Master Coder

 
felgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 503 Times in 494 Posts
felgall is a jewel in the roughfelgall is a jewel in the roughfelgall is a jewel in the rough
Of course all webTV users see it at 544px wide (since their screen resolution is fixed at that). Mobile phone users won't even see that much of the page.
__________________
Stephen
Learn Modern JavaScript - http://javascriptexample.net/
Helping others to solve their computer problem at http://www.felgall.com/
felgall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2005, 07:43 AM   PM User | #11
ronaldb66
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
Posts: 4,253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ronaldb66 is an unknown quantity at this point
Images

Your center column has an implied minimum width caused by the images in it; this prevents it from shrinking further down, which in turn forces the menu to pop under it. By the way, your header is too wide for an 800 px window as well.

25% is still far too much to ignore; I advice to reduce your images in size far enough for your site to display properly at 800x600.
__________________
Regards,
Ronald.
ronaldvanderwijden.com
ronaldb66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 12:37 AM   PM User | #12
QBall777
Regular Coder

 
QBall777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
QBall777 is an unknown quantity at this point
Thanks for all your comments,

I've made a few changes and the site is starting to look a bit better still a few things to do.

you guys know what to look for in a good site is there anything I could do to improve my site from a visual or usability point of view.

Many thanks
QBall777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Jump To Top of Thread


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Advertisement
Log in to turn off these ads.