Go Back   CodingForums.com > :: Client side development > General web building > Site reviews

Before you post, read our: Rules & Posting Guidelines

View Poll Results: What do u think of my site?
I love it 1 8.33%
coool 1 8.33%
ah its okay 6 50.00%
I hate 4 33.33%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Old 01-11-2004, 10:48 AM   PM User | #1
lnxusr86
New Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lnxusr86 is an unknown quantity at this point
Site Review!

http://www.i-guru.tk/ - This is my first personal website, its not yet complete but i would like a review of it so far so i can improve it.
lnxusr86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 11:20 AM   PM User | #2
ionsurge
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A 4D universe
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ionsurge is an unknown quantity at this point
You've got the following issues in your site:

1. Your site does not validate @ xhtml 1.0.
2. You used frames.
3. You specified the font size - a big no no.
4. You have included your styles in the actual page, another no no.
5. Ditto but with scripts.
6. You've added a preloader - it is more annoying than anything, and sometimes it doesn't go away.
7. Your menu overlaps on to that picture of the server, or whatever it may be.
8. You've used a fixed layout.
9. The link to the W3C CSS validator should be:
Code:
<a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer">xxx</a>
What you have done doesn't validate the css on your page.
10. You've got a sp error, Curriculum Vitae is what it is meant to be, not Curiculam Vitae.
11. Latest, latest what? Try to say what a menu item points to. It removes any sense of confusion.
12. The menu isn't very neat, try using same-width tabs, or decent padding on both sides. The way it is just looks sort of messy.
13. It doesn't fit into an 800 x 600 screen - get a horizontal scrollbar.

In terms of design, it does look fine, but it needs all the above ammending.



------------------------------------
Edit: By the way, never say that you love your own designs...
__________________
http://www.mudsplat.com - Web design, print, and marketing solutions.

Last edited by ionsurge; 01-11-2004 at 11:28 AM..
ionsurge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 01:03 PM   PM User | #3
skinme!
New Coder

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
skinme! is an unknown quantity at this point
Just a quickie ionsurge: Why is inline CSS a no-no? I always use external CSS so that the style sheet can be cached and to reduce the html filesize. Is that what you mean? Or are there some other implications?
__________________
skinme.net / v2.php (design nearly completed)
skinme! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 01:27 PM   PM User | #4
ionsurge
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A 4D universe
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ionsurge is an unknown quantity at this point
Exactly as you say, you only then need to load it once, instead of wasting time loading it every time you go to a page. There aren't any other implications, apart from the possibility of a lack of continuity.

__________________
http://www.mudsplat.com - Web design, print, and marketing solutions.
ionsurge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 03:32 PM   PM User | #5
lnxusr86
New Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lnxusr86 is an unknown quantity at this point
oooh boy lol, okay thankyou for u comments i'll try and fix the problems and by the way i havnt used frames, ive used the object tag instead which is supported by xhtml where as iframe isnt
lnxusr86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 05:54 PM   PM User | #6
Paul Jr
Regular Coder

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 230
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paul Jr is an unknown quantity at this point
  1. You're using tables for your layout.
  2. You're using JS to do something that could be accomplished much more easily with CSS
  3. Spacer .gif's... Ick
  4. You have an external stylesheet -- excellent, but you still have all, or some, of your styles embedded -- bad.
  5. There are all sorts of weird spaces and breaks in your images. I'm using Moz FireBird 0.7
  6. The preloader isn't necessary, and quite annoying.
  7. You have a linked image on your site, whose appearance indicates the site is authored with Valid XHTML -- which it is not.

Last edited by Paul Jr; 01-11-2004 at 06:01 PM..
Paul Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 04:24 PM   PM User | #7
lnxusr86
New Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lnxusr86 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
There are all sorts of weird spaces and breaks in your images. I'm using Moz FireBird 0.7
and how do i fix that?
lnxusr86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 05:39 PM   PM User | #8
me'
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Warwickshire, England
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
me' is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by skinme!
Just a quickie ionsurge: Why is inline CSS a no-no? I always use external CSS so that the style sheet can be cached and to reduce the html filesize. Is that what you mean? Or are there some other implications?
*cough*

Seperation and style and content? The entire driving motive behind XML and CSS?
__________________
David House - Perfect is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. (Antoine de St. Exupery).
W3Schools | XHTML Validator | CSS Validator | Colours | Typography | HTML&CSS FAQ | Go get Mozilla Now | I blog!
me' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 11:39 PM   PM User | #9
mindlessLemming
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mindlessLemming is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by lnxusr86
and how do i fix that?
You go to Mozilla.org and get a better browser for testing your work.


I've attached a screen shot of what it looks like in Moz 1.6
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	sitecapture.gif
Views:	198
Size:	38.6 KB
ID:	1885  
__________________

I take no responsibility for the above nonsense.


Left Justified
mindlessLemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 11:13 PM   PM User | #10
skinme!
New Coder

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
skinme! is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by me'
*cough*

Seperation and style and content? The entire driving motive behind XML and CSS?
Separation of style and content does not have to mean a two-file solution. Inline CSS in the HEAD of a document is still style separated from content.
__________________
skinme.net / v2.php (design nearly completed)
skinme! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 03:47 AM   PM User | #11
Paul Jr
Regular Coder

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 230
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paul Jr is an unknown quantity at this point
Yes, but embedding your styles is shooting yourself in the foot. One of the advantages with CSS, is using an external stylesheet that only has to be loaded once, thus cutting down the loading time of your site. If you're just embedding it all, you're not helping, and you might even be hurting.
Paul Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 07:59 AM   PM User | #12
skinme!
New Coder

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
skinme! is an unknown quantity at this point
Which is what I said in my original question. I apologise for the stupid question. It just occurred to me that inline isn't as big a no-no as no CSS.
__________________
skinme.net / v2.php (design nearly completed)
skinme! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2004, 05:20 PM   PM User | #13
lnxusr86
New Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lnxusr86 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by mindlessLemming
You go to Mozilla.org and get a better browser for testing your work.


I've attached a screen shot of what it looks like in Moz 1.6
yeah i got mozzilla firebird... im staring at the screen what to i do to fix the prob i mean in the coding like...
lnxusr86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2004, 04:23 PM   PM User | #14
me'
Senior Coder

 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Warwickshire, England
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
me' is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by skinme!
Separation of style and content does not have to mean a two-file solution. Inline CSS in the HEAD of a document is still style separated from content.
Inline styles are applied using the style attribute of elements. Styles contained within <style> and </style> are embedded, not inline. Hope that clears things up.
__________________
David House - Perfect is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. (Antoine de St. Exupery).
W3Schools | XHTML Validator | CSS Validator | Colours | Typography | HTML&CSS FAQ | Go get Mozilla Now | I blog!
me' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2004, 08:58 AM   PM User | #15
skinme!
New Coder

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
skinme! is an unknown quantity at this point
Thanks for clearing that up.
__________________
skinme.net / v2.php (design nearly completed)
skinme! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Jump To Top of Thread


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Advertisement
Log in to turn off these ads.