Amateur question about combining functions

[cineweekly.com]

I'm not familiar with Javascript yet and I'm trying to combine these (functions?) to reduce space. Not sure of the syntax.

<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
    $('.slideshowA').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: 0
	});
});
</script> 
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
    $('.slideshowB').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: -1000
	});
});
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
    $('.slideshowC').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: -2000
	});
});
</script>

[Old Pedant]

Well, first of all, you aren't really using basic JavaScript when you do that.

You are using the jQuery library. So some of the code is going to be a bit (or a LOT!) different than if you were using ordinary JavaScript.

It is kind of like you are using a GPS navigation system (e.g, a TomTom or similar) but never learned how to read a map. You are trusting that your navigation system will always know how to read the map for you.

But to directly answer your question:

<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
    $('.slideshowA').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: 0
	});
    $('.slideshowB').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: -1000
	});
    $('.slideshowC').cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: -2000
	});
});
</script>

I don't think you an make it much shorter than that without major changes to how you code it.

[cineweekly.com]

That's what I was looking for, thanks! I was so close when playing around but couldn't nail it down. Now I know.

[Old Pedant]

Just as a for-instance, you could probable rewrite it all thus:

<script type="text/javascript">
function doCycle( which, wait )
{
    $(".slideshow" + which).cycle({
		fx: 'fade',
		speed: 4000,
		delay: wait
	});
}
$(document).ready(
    function() 
    {
        doCycle("A",0);
        doCycle("B",-1000);
        doCycle("C",-2000);
    }
);
</script>

Shorter, but hardly worth doing the rewrite, is it?