I doubt the CPU statistics are right for Chrome. Running two tabs + a web app and adding the usage together, I get over 100k memory, which is where the fox hovers about all the time.
It doesn't make any sense to me... why would Microsoft release another horrible update of their terrible browser when there's much more compliant and up-to-date options available? You'd think the common thing to do is to replicate or even improve on what is already available as open source technology... it's times like this I'm glad I don't use Windows.
You'd think the common thing to do is to replicate or even improve on what is already available as open source technology...
I don't think that would be any better in the long run. I've used IE8 on Windows 7, it is much better than their old standby, IE6. Competition is good for everyone, Microsoft just became complacent for a long time, it will be interesting to see where they go.
Location: Utah, USA, Northwestern hemisphere, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Alpha Quadrant
Posts: 7,687
Thanks: 42
Thanked 637 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oracleguy
I don't think that would be any better in the long run. I've used IE8 on Windows 7, it is much better than their old standby, IE6. Competition is good for everyone, Microsoft just became complacent for a long time, it will be interesting to see where they go.
They would do well to dump that garbage Javascript engine they're using and go with a faster one.
Location: Utah, USA, Northwestern hemisphere, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Alpha Quadrant
Posts: 7,687
Thanks: 42
Thanked 637 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukedraik
They would do well to follow standards better.
Read Oracleguy's link above-- you'll see they've been pretty deliberate in their non-compliance. butt holes. If you asked them they'd refute the standards