unfortunately without any more context I have no clue what any of that means-
If you are looking for something "smart" to rebut said jerk I would simply say
How are we supposed to solve a mathematical problem when you cannot even write it out correctly?
The first equation does not have a closing parenthesis, your "r" is indiscernible from the Gamma function denotation, your "B is indiscernible from the Beta function denotation, and it is unclear whether or not the "T" is supposed to be tau or "T"- furthermore is h being raised to the power of 1 or is that a denotation of h prime (differentiate h)? How can you expect results when you cannot even write legibly?
to add to that you said "algebra"
no most assuredly this is not a simple algebra problem- It looks to me as though it is someone trying to be slick with either Laplace or Fourier transforms... but I see what my background is- also in some random google's it seems to fit (in some-places) into probability statistics functions...
Is this an algebra level coarse? or is this guy just stroking his own ego? I've been out of the complex math world for a while- I can figure out how to do those fxn's and remember what they look like etc; but by no means do I reg practice... I think most of the population does not either... If you are trying to look "cool" or "impressive" to students, try being "cool" or "impressive" @ something relevant... of coarse a bunch of students are not going to have upper level math fxn's down; or they would have gotten this and it would not be impressive to pose as a question, it would be standard