[Fou-Lu]

If you need to keep it sequential and compact in the array, and sized only large enough to hold the items within it, then you'd be better of with a second array. Simply iterate through the array that exists, and push onto the new array. If you hit the matching item to remove, then skip it, and keep going. If the end result is that no item was removed, than return the original, otherwise return the new.
This said, if you keep only an array large enough to hold a given number of items at the time, than its not really optimized. It's quite a bit of effort to copy an array into a larger one, than it is to leave unused space.
Compare it to the add. The remove should be pretty much the exact opposite. If you create an array of current.length + 1, then add an item to it, then it makes sense to do the same with remove. If the add is not always incrementing the current array and creating a new one, than I'd suggest that the remove should not and instead simply setting the offset when found to null.