![]() |
what frameworks do you use?
Hello everybody.
I'd like to hear what frameworks you use and feel to suggest ? thanks for sharing. |
i use prototype with scriptaculous and Prototype Window. Between the 3 it makes everything from ui to ajax a snap.
That said, I'm biased because I have yet to use most of the others (yui, jquery, etc). |
i used to use them, i like the architecture of Prototype.
but they all have too much bloat and incompatibilities as a result. i recommend making your own from scratch. you learn a lot about javascript and various browsers by doing so. here is the basis of most of my apps: Code:
if you don't know about Array.map, you owe it to yourself to check it out. |
prototype is pretty ok , i found it has very nice methods, jquery is ugly i have never seen a more mutilated piece of javascript and aside all its stupid slow, fast methods that have plague the internet..
|
any jquery fan :D ??
|
Quote:
I started out with my own (having become very proficient with js), but later tried on YUI for size for a while. I ultimately found jQuery to be a better option, due to its intuitive, selector-based syntax and it's now my default framework/mindset for any project with enough js to make using a framework worthwhile. |
what didnt you like of yui ?
|
It wasn't that I didn't like YUI, per se.
I just felt that jQuery's level and kind of abstraction made for a smoother, quicker workflow for me, particularly given that I spent much of my (working) time nose-deep in CSS anyway. It seemed alien at first, but quickly came to feel more intuitive than YUI. I even tried add-ons for YUI which gave it support for selector-based DOM selection, but jQuery felt more robust. The chainability is also very appealing. |
what plugin/features are you using more out of jquery ?
|
Quote:
However, I find that I can achieve most of the techniques I'm inclined to use without the need for additional plugins - which, for many simple taks, only serve to bloat the code. After all, plugins only really serve to supply an API/abstracted front-end for tasks which can all be achieved using the main jQuery library (combined with some good, ol' W3C DOM-scripting and js core), but which might make the techniques more approachable (packagable) for those without a good understanding of DOM logic. |
I use prototype, the available functions and options are huge, and I use it along side script.aculo.us which is the best effects library, it offers a lot more than just static effects and very specific options, slider, controls, builder and transition effects on the effects! Very cool.
Plus prototype is only 47kb compress and i think around 30kb gzipped. Not the smallest, I know, but a lot smaller than people think, and is totally worth the extra 15kb. |
rhinodog8 have you tried jquery ?
|
i prefere mootools, but i used jquery too.
|
Quote:
|
Interesting thread - someone told me jQuery is by far the best and I had no reason to doubt them, so I have started learning/using it.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.