Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 1 of 1
02-27-2010, 08:08 AM #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Google marks seemingly perfect emails as spam
Hi codingforums! Long a lurker, finally decided to sign up. Hopefully I will be able to be of some help!
The problem: Google marks seemingly correctly formatted emails from my apache/postfix server as spam. Sample email as follows;
(I have replaced my domain with mydomain.com.au)
Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Received: by 10.150.216.21 with SMTP id o21cs22383ybg; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.152.75 with SMTP id f11mr1470919ibw.50.1267254715619; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:11:55 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from mydomain.com.au (mydomain.com.au [18.104.22.168]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 29si1651619iwn.31.2010.02.26.23.11.54; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of firstname.lastname@example.org designates 22.214.171.124 as permitted sender) client-ip=126.96.36.199; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of email@example.com designates 188.8.131.52 as permitted sender) firstname.lastname@example.org Received: by mydomain.com.au (Postfix, from userid 48) id ACB735030340; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:11:53 +1100 (EST) To: email@example.com Subject: Quote for David Brent (00125512123) From: firstname.lastname@example.org Reply-To: email@example.com X-Mailer: PHP/5.2.10 Message-Id: <20100227071153.ACB735030340@mydomain.com.au> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:11:53 +1100 (EST) Name: David Brent Mobile: 00125512123 Phone: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Date: 2010-20-21 Time: 21:00 Location: Syd Eventype: Musicians Message: Yep, this should work!!!! how did you hear about us: Newspaper
* I have tried posting to several different google accounts, all end up as spam.
* Mydomain.com.au uses Google Apps as email provider.
* I have added "v=spf1 a mx ~all" as TXT in my NS.
The headers seem fine, and the SPF look up seems to pass (?).. Any ideas?