Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 259 Times in 256 Posts

    HTML5: Time to impliment yet?

    I'm redesigning the layout for one of my sites right now, and so the question has become HTML5 or not.

    Now, I've already started using elements of it, such as a doctype of <html>, just using <script>, the simple basic stuff. I've held off on using the new tags (I'd love to start using header, footer, article, etc), but as I've read it, IE < 8 doesn't support those tags, and without a JS script like the HTML5 shiv, sites wouldn't render properly on IE. Given how big a market IE is, I'm trying to figure out if I should move on to HTML5, and how much.

    The big issue is I'm a self-trained programmer (I did biomedical engineering in college), and so what I know is only from what I've picked up, part of it being, unless the site functionality is directly linked to JS working, always have a backup. I feel like the basic content not rendering without JS (if a person has JS disabled), is a wrong way to go about it. Am I being too paranoid? Should I just go ahead and start using the tags? I'm not planning on using too much else of HTML5 right now.

  • #2
    The fat guy next door VIPStephan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Halle (Saale), Germany
    Posts
    8,606
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 997 Times in 970 Posts
    I wasn’t around when HTML 4 or XHTML 1 were officially released so I can’t say how this change took place (i. e. if people suddenly switched from one version to the next one or used unofficial versions before release) but HTML 5 isn’t an official specification yet and no browser maker is obliged to support any of this yet (just as with CSS 3) despite the fact that some have already implemented respective features.

    So, I’d rather stick with the latest official version until either major support is guranteed or the new version is official and major support is guaranteed.

  • #3
    The Apostate Apostropartheid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,215
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 265 Times in 263 Posts
    Why would you bother, then? HTML 4.01 is pretty much compatible with HTML 5, and there's no difference between how the browser renders them.

  • #4
    Senior Coder effpeetee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Clapham Junction - London SW
    Posts
    4,885
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked 204 Times in 203 Posts
    I use the upcomimg version HTML5 to get used to it gradually. My test is 'Does it degrade satisfactorily with IE versions.'

    Also my three sites are limited viewing. Mostly this forum and my family so there is no real worry. I use IETester to check the results.

    Frank
    * Sources (updated: 21.11.2012.
    Using Windows 8 Professional. 64bit with HP Photosmart 5510 printer Very useful site here.

  • #5
    Regular Coder Lerura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    881
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 115 Times in 114 Posts
    HTML5 is not supported well enough by the browsers yet!
    It is way to early to start creating webpages in it.

    This site can give you an idea of how well your browser supports HTML5.

    My 3 browsers: Firefox 3.6.8 , Opera 10.51 and IE 8.0.6 scored respectively 139,127 and 27 point out of 300.
    That's not enough!

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    829
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 79 Times in 77 Posts
    If you haven't coded any pages or just started, I would go with the latest standards. Opera has already fully supported CSS 3.0 and, I think, HTML 5 that is currently set. Changes may or may not be made, but nothing is set in stone. If you have coded a large site with XHTML 1.0, there is NO need to make any "upgrade" to HTML 5. Might want to use some of the newer properties CSS 3 has though. In fact, if you did your pages with HTML 4.01 Strict, I doubt if there would be much improvement at this date to re-code to HTML 5.

    Personally I like HTML 5 and CSS 3 so far. Just wish more browsers supported both.
    ☠ ☠RON☠ ☠

  • #7
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    3,335
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 363 Times in 360 Posts
    I found it odd that considering that all the major browsers were I thought supposed to be involved in the new HTML5 standards, that IE8 renders an HTML5 like crap..lol Firefox seems to work well. Havent tested on Opera, or Safari, or Chrome yet. Anyway, regardless, I think I read that html5 wont be standard for at least 3 more years. Still good a time as any to start designing testing pages for your own use and lerning curve.

  • #8
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,535
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 259 Times in 256 Posts
    Yah, so I guess I'm of like mind as others: I like the standards, its just not worth implementing at the minute given a lack of market compatibility.

  • #9
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    829
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 79 Times in 77 Posts
    Last edited by Major Payne; 09-01-2010 at 08:34 PM. Reason: Redid link.
    ☠ ☠RON☠ ☠

  • #10
    Regular Coder Doctor_Varney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Midlands, UK
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 29 Times in 28 Posts
    My instinct is always: don't use anything until it's been around the block a few times. Window's Vista springs to mind. Always stay several 'jumps' behind new technology, to ensure things work for you in the real world. There are plenty of crash-test dummies willing to drive innovative Toyotas. Just stay a comfortable distance behind them.

    Dr. V


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •