Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,959
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 76 Times in 76 Posts

    KB for web, quality

    If I define that the shortest side of images on my page will be 900 px or less,
    then is there a formula , what is the lowest KB that the quality will still be ok, at 900 px longest side

    Was looking some of my photos and 250 and 150 KB looks same to me.

  • #2
    The fat guy next door VIPStephan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Halle (Saale), Germany
    Posts
    8,607
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 997 Times in 970 Posts
    When I’m exporting JPEGs in Fireworks I can set the quality in percent and I notice a clear difference in qualtiy between 85% and 86%. So usually the optimal quality/size setting is at 86% for medium sized images (in terms of dimensions). At large images you have to determine according to their purpose. Unless you have high qulity images for a photo gallery you should keep your images below 50KB if possible. Now I guess an image of 900px width can’t be keept at this size without losing a lot of quality so there do whatever you feel looks reasonable. If the image looks the same to you at 250KB and 150KB then use 150KB by all means. Reduce the quality of the image to like 10 or 20% and see how this looks like. Then you’ll probably notice a difference.

    In the end you should do whatever you feel looks acceptable while keeping the file size as low as possible (but as high as necessary).

  • #3
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,959
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 76 Times in 76 Posts
    Thaks, this 50 KB info was helpful. Under 50KB dramatic changes takes place (-:
    There is a sample under 50KB (targeted to 50 KB with irfanwiev save for web)
    Looks almost the same as 250 KB.

    I feel this quality acceptable/reasonable.

    Last edited by BubikolRamios; 06-19-2009 at 12:10 AM.

  • #4
    The fat guy next door VIPStephan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Halle (Saale), Germany
    Posts
    8,607
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 997 Times in 970 Posts
    Usually, if photos were taken with a high quality camera the visual impact on these images if saved for web with lower quality isn’t as drastic as a photo that has been taken with a low quality camera in the first place. The above image looks perfect to me, probably also due to being of high quality in the first place. For the web this looks optimal.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •