Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Coder missing-score's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Website Liability

    I had an idea for a website earlier, here is my idea in a nutshell:

    www.mywebsite.com has testimonials about the webmasters of other websites, for example, there might be a testimonial about the owner of www.yourwebsite.com

    Ratings would be left by developers or designers that have worked with the person in question and the information would be in a sort of "lookup directory" so that designers or developers thinking of working for this person could possibly find out some past information.

    Obviously, it would be a little more complex than this...

    None of the webmasters personal details (real name, contact information, address etc.) unless they asked them to be. Just the website URL would be used, so I shouldnt be violating anything there.

    My concern is though, is there any liability in having ratings about others websites and their owners. Eg: If a website was given a bad rating, could that website owner legally make me take the review down (assuming that the review isn't slanderous).

    Thanks
    Matt

  • #2
    Regular Coder zro@rtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    on the network
    Posts
    433
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    no legal expert here

    now i'm not officially credentialed to weigh in on this but I dont see what argument anyone could have as long as you say its not "slanderous", "libel", or advocating violence or something toward the webmaster (however appropriate it may seem). If something is "news-worthy" (pretty much entirely subjective) as far as i know its fair-game to review it.

    I suppose you could run into a problem if a user says something like i had an account on site X and they did all this bad stuff too me and then site X contacts you and says that never happened or that person was never a user. Although it seems rather insiginificant and less than always varifiable,... so maybe, but i doubt it.
    ._-zro
    zro@redtv
    zro.redtv.org

    "If HTML and the Web made all the online documents look like one huge book, RDF, schema, and inference languages will make all the data in the world look like one huge database"
    -Tim Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web, 1999

  • #3
    Senior Coder missing-score's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by zro@rtv
    now i'm not officially credentialed to weigh in on this but I dont see what argument anyone could have as long as you say its not "slanderous", "libel", or advocating violence or something toward the webmaster (however appropriate it may seem). If something is "news-worthy" (pretty much entirely subjective) as far as i know its fair-game to review it.

    I suppose you could run into a problem if a user says something like i had an account on site X and they did all this bad stuff too me and then site X contacts you and says that never happened or that person was never a user. Although it seems rather insiginificant and less than always varifiable,... so maybe, but i doubt it.
    Thanks

    If it works out how I plan then it should be fairly simple to spot problem users. For example, if you recieve 200 positive feedback and 1 is negative, you can conclude that:

    • The user made 1 mistake out of 200 sales
    • The user was a problem user


    I'd like to hear anyone elses opinions.

  • #4
    Supreme Master coder! _Aerospace_Eng_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In a place far, far away...
    Posts
    19,291
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,043 Times in 1,019 Posts
    Hmm its a good idea but there are so many people out there who do web design and the chances of someone else working with the same person that another person worked with are slim. There is a site that has done something similar except they do it with college professors instead. It allows you to leave comments and rate the professors based on their performance in the courses. www.ratemyprofessor.com is you want to get some ideas of how it works.
    ||||If you are getting paid to do a job, don't ask for help on it!||||

  • #5
    Senior Coder missing-score's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by _Aerospace_Eng_
    Hmm its a good idea but there are so many people out there who do web design and the chances of someone else working with the same person that another person worked with are slim. There is a site that has done something similar except they do it with college professors instead. It allows you to leave comments and rate the professors based on their performance in the courses. www.ratemyprofessor.com is you want to get some ideas of how it works.
    I know what you are saying, but I have been parts of projects and have been asked what the clients were like (clients being the website owners). I definatley think it could be useful but it would have to get alot of ratings for a large range of sites and/or people first.

    I would like to allow the option for website owners to register themselves using more than the websites they own so that they could be linked to owning various websites.

  • #6
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    The idea is worth a shot; as far as liability you'd need to write a good disclaimer something like how all the comments are the opinion those of the people who authored them and not you. I'd suggest looking on commercial sites that let people comment on stuff they usually have disclaimers of that nature and might give you an idea on what they say to prevent them from becoming liable from what someone says on their site.

    And to prevent like disgruntled customers from posting non-relevent comments just have some sort of approval queue so all comments have to be approved before they appear on the site. That way you can restrict to developer and designers comments.
    OracleGuy

  • #7
    Regular Coder zro@rtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    on the network
    Posts
    433
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Definitely! those two things i think would make you golden. Good Disclaimer and a moderation queue. I dont know why i didnt just say that before... seems so obvious now that you point it out, oracle.
    ._-zro
    zro@redtv
    zro.redtv.org

    "If HTML and the Web made all the online documents look like one huge book, RDF, schema, and inference languages will make all the data in the world look like one huge database"
    -Tim Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web, 1999


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •