Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Near some trees
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Site Layout .. what do you think is best?

    It's an easy questions..... Frames vs Included Content.

    For example, is it better to have a html header in a frame at the top of the broswer window as it's own entity or to have the same html header included in the top of all your other pages, eg index, home etc thereby eliminating the need for a frames page?

  • #2
    Supreme Master coder! _Aerospace_Eng_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In a place far, far away...
    Posts
    19,291
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1,043 Times in 1,019 Posts
    Frames=bad. If you are worried about search engines then I wouldn't use frames.

  • #3
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Tough call, personally i wouldn't go with frames.

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
    Posts
    4,253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Frames? Better not

    Frames and framesets have a number of well-documented drawbacks and offer very few advantages that can't be realised using other techniques.

    If you want to include certain page elements from a single source on a number of pages with little or no variation there are perfectly suitable server side solutions you can apply; no need for frames.
    Regards,
    Ronald.
    ronaldvanderwijden.com

  • #5
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Near some trees
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldb66
    Frames and framesets have a number of well-documented drawbacks and offer very few advantages that can't be realised using other techniques.

    If you want to include certain page elements from a single source on a number of pages with little or no variation there are perfectly suitable server side solutions you can apply; no need for frames.
    This is exactly the way I was thinking. The thing is that once I have included my header, menu, page footer and a couple of other elements on to say.. my index page. It really effects the loading time and the page transition (smoothness).

    In it's own way it looks very unprofessional.

  • #6
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
    Posts
    4,253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Page loading

    Internet users nowadays are pretty much used to pages refreshing entirely from the ground up; if your pages take too long to load or load irregularly, you might want to look into how they are constructed, how large the image files are, if you are making efficient use of caching, etc.
    Infamous are complex, multiply nested all-table layouts: rendering often is deferred until the entire page has loaded, or it needs to be reflowed several times over causing a shifty, yerky experience.

    If you'd like some pointers, please supply a link so we can take a look at it.
    Regards,
    Ronald.
    ronaldvanderwijden.com

  • #7
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Near some trees
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The site isn't online yet but I will definitely be looking for opinions and criticisms when it is, thanks!

    You may have hit the nail on the head though... My main pages contain tables and my included pages contain tables and some graphics.

    I can see how this could be causing the problem.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •