Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    england
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    how long have you been using html

    ive only been using it for about 3 months.... how long does it take to get really good at it
    Last edited by sharpshooter; 07-18-2002 at 07:15 AM.

  • #2
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
    Posts
    4,253
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've been writing stuff for about a couple of years now... it really depends on how often you build pages, and if you keep up with recent developments. I try and read a lot on various sites to keep up and forums like these are a great source for tips & tricks and solutions others found to their problems.
    I guess you just keep learning and improving...
    Regards,
    Ronald.
    ronaldvanderwijden.com

  • #3
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    yeah right; it's like how long is a piece of string - "good" is a very subjective word. I'd say prioritorise what you want to do - set benchmarks that are meaningful to you

  • #4
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    The long you use it the more you get to know it and be comfortable with it. But you never stop learning.
    OracleGuy

  • #5
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United Kingdom Confused: Often
    Posts
    859
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I reckon that you cant get stuck in the boundarys of HTML, just expand beyond them... meaning if you think youve mastered HTML then there is always PHP/ASP/Whatever else to make what you know how to do better.... if you get my jist...

    Keep at it
    redhead

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    It's alot better now that I've semi-mastered CSS.
    [+] Computer/PC issues [+] Silverpaw3D
    ------------------------------------------------
    Never buy a dwarf with learning disabilities...

    ...it's not big, and it's not clever.

  • #7
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Originally posted by mouse
    It's alot better now that I've semi-mastered CSS.
    Yeah CSS can do wonders and can save time.

  • #8
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I spent most of my time mastering tables and writing correct code in accordance to the W3C standards.. as tables are really mean and lean to structure your web site. Sometimes they do get complex, but if you use a little bit of commenting or identing here and there, everything should still go well . Writing proper code instead of poorly coded and proprietary code isn't the easiest of all as well. Cross-browser support was hard, but fortunately as NS4.x use should insignificant (sorry justamom ) by now, support for NS6.x, Mozilla, and IE4+ should not be too hard.

    All in all, just keep it going , try new things, and code often.
    ~Kang He
    Prepare to be b0rkified.

  • #9
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Originally posted by Kang He
    I spent most of my time mastering tables and writing correct code in accordance to the W3C standards.. as tables are really mean and lean to structure your web site.
    W3C have frowned upon the use of tables for page structure and use on non-data content for years.
    [+] Computer/PC issues [+] Silverpaw3D
    ------------------------------------------------
    Never buy a dwarf with learning disabilities...

    ...it's not big, and it's not clever.

  • #10
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Yes, they might prefer page layouts using CSS, but it gets messy with older browsers. And I prefer to have something more "concrete" to work with, if you understand what I mean.

    I frown upon W3C's Microsoft technologies encouragement..

    and I believe Jason also had something against their tutorials ?
    ~Kang He
    Prepare to be b0rkified.

  • #11
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Tables are good for content imo, sometimes they can mean you end up with 10 times the amount of code as with CSS, somethings are a real pain in the arse to do in CSS though; I use tables to keep my menu's together, in CSS it was never going to work...
    [+] Computer/PC issues [+] Silverpaw3D
    ------------------------------------------------
    Never buy a dwarf with learning disabilities...

    ...it's not big, and it's not clever.

  • #12
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Tables are also a lot easier regarding server-side applications generating content..
    ~Kang He
    Prepare to be b0rkified.

  • #13
    jkd
    jkd is offline
    Senior Coder jkd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    metro DC
    Posts
    3,163
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
    Originally posted by Kang He
    and I believe Jason also had something against their tutorials ?
    I have something against w3schools.com. But I promote W3C standards all over (and hence I promote Mozilla, because it is by far the best suite to use W3C standards with).

    As for:
    Originally posted by Kang He
    Tables are also a lot easier regarding server-side applications generating content..
    I'd have to differ. If you have a decent structure to your site, returing <div class="bla">some content</div> should make no difference in the same context as <tr><td>some content</td></tr>



    What is really holding back CSS is IE. There are a lot of awesome, powerful features defined in the specs. Gecko has them, Opera has a lot of them, and IE doesn't. Until IE implements them, most developers won't begin to implement them. But until IE sees a market share taken away from them, they most probably won't implement anything (significant) new. Vicious cycle that can only be stopped by developers - you code for something, and people want to see the content, they may need to download a decent browser.

    But that's a different argument all together, but before I started ranting, I was going to mention how IE makes table-less layouts a major pain to implement decently. I'll code up something in XHTML 1.1 that looks perfect in Gecko and Opera 6, only to find out (again, and again ) that IE's poor support of CSS2 is holding back this property from rendering, etc...

  • #14
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    This little Earth.
    Posts
    383
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    i was kinda wondering why 'how long does it take to be good at html' ended up in a debate about how nice certain browsers or standards are or aren't ...
    how long it takes to be 'good' depends on how 'good' u want to be... anyhow, i've been using html seriously for quite a few months now ... i started with just <marquee> and <img>, and not very long after that i could make 'something that resembled a decent webpage'. just get the hang of tables and divs and styles, (that doesn't take very long, if u're gonna take the time out for it), and u'll be able to make it work for you, the other tags mostly just fit in. of course tables are good for 'solid' stuff, but just for the layout i barely ever bother, i just use divs with stye="top:y;left:x"... pretty handy most of the time. but all the browser-compatibility stuff jkd said above was right, u might be as good as you want to be at html, but it's pain-staking to learn how to make ur html work everywhere. as far as i'm concerned i haven't done anything yet that i know will work on Gecko (that's right, jkd ) .... not that i haven't been thoroughly frustrated a couple of times at Microsoft's trying to be so different from everyone else, come to think of it ...
    Last edited by ASAAKI; 07-20-2002 at 12:40 PM.
    'If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.'

  • #15
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United Kingdom Confused: Often
    Posts
    859
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Originally posted by ASAAKI
    i started with just <marquee>...[/B]
    *shudder*
    redhead


  •  
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •