Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    WA
    WA is offline
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Mozilla code bloated? Apple snubs the browser.

    There's an article on News.com today on Apple's decision to release a browser based on Konqueror rather than Mozilla citing bloated code on Mozilla's part: http://news.com.com/2100-1023-980492...g=fd_lede1_hed

    For people who have used both Konqueror and Mozilla, or are simply knowledgeable on the two, what are your thoughts?
    - George
    - JavaScript Kit- JavaScript tutorials and 400+ scripts!
    - JavaScript Reference- JavaScript reference you can relate to.

  • #2
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've not tested it personally, but a couple of people have emailed me about it and the consenus seems to be it's very fast, but a little buggy; it is a beta after all.

    My experience of Konqueror is little different from Mozilla - adequately specced for the kind of stuff I do, fast enough but not exactly greased lightning; I've not noticed any appreciable difference in rendering and processing speed between moz and konqueoror on Linux; Konqueror (in KDE) starts up faster, but then it would if its the window manager. Konqueror in Gnome is appallingly slow to start up - much slower than mozilla.

    This is all subjective I know. I don't know enough about it to comment on the size of Mozilla's codebase, but my own experience is that all versions of mozilla are slow to start-up. But other gecko browsers - like k-meleon and Pheonix - don't have this problem; I sincerely hope that that report is not confusing gecko (very good rendering engine) with chrome (appalingly bad, slow and buggy interface)

    I'll comment more when my new iMac arrives imo "Safari" is a really cool name
    Last edited by brothercake; 01-14-2003 at 03:37 PM.

  • #3
    jkd
    jkd is offline
    Senior Coder jkd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    metro DC
    Posts
    3,163
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
    As far as I know they picked KHTML because it was easier to embed.

    Gecko is still a far better rendering engine in terms of what it supports, not to say that KHTML isn't bad....

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands, Baarn, Ut.
    Posts
    4,252
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Review

    There's a nice review of apple's new browser on Webmonkey. Although they hold it for a great promise, they still prefer Mozilla's Chimera.
    Regards,
    Ronald.
    ronaldvanderwijden.com

  • #5
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    217
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I use both Konqueror (KHTML) and Mozilla (Gecko) and GNOME 2 as my Desktop Enviroment.Mozilla starts much faster than Konqueror (eventhough Konqueror's chrome is bloated too,since it's also a file manager).The rendering seems to be the same speed (eventhough Gecko supports more of JavaScript,CSS and the DOM).Valid pages render the same in Gecko and KHTML.

    Btw,it has nothing to do with the Window Manager.I use Kwin under GNOME 2 and it's the same

  • #6
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've got a new mac now And having tried Safari I'll say this much .. their hype is basically true; it is *very* fast. I'm seeing a few CSS bugs, but nothing serious. Scripting wise, I ran some code through it which was designed for Konqueror - basically a script that was designed for mozilla but with a couple of browser hacks - and Safari responded exactly like Konqueor.

    But I've heard it mentioned that Safari has user-agent spoofing ... does anyone know about this? I can't find it in the preferences.

  • #7
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Ah .. it seems you need an add-on http://gordon.sourcecod.com/sites/safari_enhancer.php

    Also has a DOM viewer and Render Tree viewer - but no javascript console.

    And I've noticed another weird thing ... document mouse events don't fire unless the document has the focus; but when you click a link that opens a new window, the new document doesn't automatically take the focus ...

    The end result I noticed is that if the new window contains something like a DHTML menu, or other mouseover driven effect, it doesn't work until you click on the document to give it the focus!
    Last edited by brothercake; 01-26-2003 at 05:04 PM.

  • #8
    Cam
    Cam is offline
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto ON Canada
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I've used Mozilla, Konqueror and Netscape in Linux . I find Mozilla and Konqueror to take about the same time to load, (Konqueror may be a little slower).

    I tend to use minimalist window managers like fluxbox or occasionally windowmaker, which does speed things up somewhat.

    I'm not completely happy with most browsers as they have more than I need (I use other email clients etc.) and the lightweights have enough inocompatabilities with newer web standards that I don't use them.

    I use Mozilla in both windows and linux, mostly because of its ability to refuse pop-ups and the tab system, which I like.

    For those who may be interested, here's an article on lightweight web browsers in Linux (2003)

    http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •