Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    592
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Tip of the Day : Did you know about Microsoft ?

    Taken from :
    "Just Say No to Micro$oft" by Tony Bove ,
    No Starch Press

    __________________________

    The Empire Strikes Back: A Thumbnail History of Microsoft


    At every step of personal computer software evolution, Microsoft either
    pushed our or bought out competition and consolidated its position as a
    monopolist.

    1980 to 1983

    Microsoft rolled our DOS, avirtual copy of Digital Research's CP/M, as
    described in the precedingsection, along with the introduction of the IBM
    PC. The PC clone indusuywas born, and nearly every manufacturer of CP/M
    machines went our of business.
    For me, it meanr that all my CP/M-based applications were useless, my
    third-party add-in cards for the standard SlOO bus used in CP/M computers
    were obsolete, and my documents and databases were locked on dish that
    would never be read by the new wave of PCs.


    1984-1990

    Microsoft squashed all competition by developing windows, a virtual copy of
    the innovative GEM Desktop graphical user interface (GUI) by (once again)
    Digital Research to run on top of DOS. The Apple macinrosh rose in opposition,
    its interface also loosely based on the GEM Desktop (which, in turn, was
    based on an interface developed at Xerox). Despite being unstable for years,
    Windows grew to dominate the desktop PC business, leaving the Apple Mac
    marginalized, while Digital Research went out of business.

    For me, it meanr buying a Mac to do graphics and page layout, buying a
    PC to maintain compatibility with clients who used PCs, and spending the
    next few years tying to share files between them. The Mac eventually captured
    most of my work because the Mac emphasized desktop publishing: to this day
    I can still open the files I created on early Macs.



    1991-1996


    Microsoft released Windows 3.1, and several years later, to fix bugs in that version, they released Windows 95 to unversal acclaim, Microsoft touted this version as ready and able to do desktop publishing (which it finally was) and multimedia (which it woefully wasn't - but at least it played music, a decade after the Mac started playing music). The high tech industry, dominated by high-profile investors in Windows application software companies, gave windows 95 its vote of confidence as a standard operating system, while competitors vanished. Apple held on to its proprietary system and refused to license it, dooming the Mac to a very small minority market share.

    Microsoft also took over the markets for word processing and spreadsheet applications with prodocts that were essentially clones of WordStar and WordPerfect (word processing) and VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3(spreadsheets). All these companies, founded by ex-hippies and free thinkers, were eventually sold or went out of business, and their products are no longer on the market. All efforts to standardize document formats(including Adobe's PDF) were sabotaged by Microsoft's inability to print to those formats.(Microsoft wasn't the only company to blame.The markers of QuarkXPress, the most popular page layout software for magazine publishing, were also reluctant to support them. Quark had learned a thing or two from Microsoft's marketing strategy, and locked in its publishing customers by hard-wiring solutions that work today but break tomorrow, forcing customers to buy upgrades.)

    For me, it meant disaster if I used any word processor other than Microsoftword.
    PDF remained an elusive ideal never fully realizeduntil after the
    Internet hit and put Microsoft off-balance. Fortunately, Word on the Mac has
    been a tolerable tool set until vely recently (one of the reasons I wrote this
    book)


    1996-Today


    Microsoft owns more than 90 percent of the desktop computer system market,
    marginalizing the Mac as the only possible competitor. Microsoft crushed all
    other Internet browsers, putting innovator Nerscape out of business, and
    moved swiftly to lock our other media players, putting pioneer RealNetwork
    in jeopardy. Microsoft gained considerable market share in the world of PDAs
    and handheld devices with a portable version of Windows, and is now moving
    swiftly to establish its digital rights management ( DRM ) technology to control
    access to all of the world's audio and video content. And so it goes on.

    BY the year 2000, I was exploring various alternatives to Microsoft softwares
    to escape virus attack. As an employee of various technology companies
    over the years, I was required to use PC laptops running Windows 95, but
    I continued to invest in Mac Technology at my home/offlce,
    because windows 95 was not suitable for multimedia work. As my children grew up on
    Macs and PCs, they preferred PCs-ironically because more games and
    multimedia titles were available for PCs. While game developers used Macs
    to create and edit graphics, digital audio, and digital video, their results were
    coded into Windows games, because Windows owned the lion's share of the
    PC market.

    Even I got into the act, developing and publishing a multimedia CD-ROM
    called Haight-Ashbury in Sixties(http://www.rockument.com). It was completely developed and programmed
    on a Mac, but sold to run on windows 95 PCs.I also sold a Mac version.
    And I spent about 10 hr on PC technical support for every minute I spent
    on Mac technical support.
    My family now uses Macs and PCs linked in a wireless Apple Airport network
    (and Ethernet). We use Airport because it work seamlessly with wireless
    Mac and PC laptops with no need for software installation on the PC laptops.
    I now use nothing but alternatives to Microsoft software on my Mac PowerBook
    (except for testing purposes).

    With the Adobe PDF standard for documents and the sevice capabilities
    of websites and portals on the Internet, there is less of a need to use Microsoft
    software-even for business. It's possible to use the Web as an interface to
    popular enterprise applications such as SAP business packages and Oracle
    databases. No longer do people need to duplicate their once PC environment
    on a home PC. People can use whatever they want, as long as they can
    connect to the Web.

    At the same rime, all the folks using Microsof software and windows
    are targets for viruses and nearly defenseless against them, relying solely on
    Microsoft to address the problem. Bill Gates spoke at a trade show in early
    2004and declared that that year, Microsoft would focus on security. Thanks,
    Bill. Three years after September 11, and I feel as insecure as ever.
    Consumers aren't the only ones left insecure by Microsoft (in this case,
    by Microsoft code). Businesses are also much too insecure due to Microsoft's
    monopolistic practices. Software entrepreneurs avoid entire areas of computing
    because Microsoft owns them.


    Microsoft is not known for innovation but for copycat engineering and
    stifling the competition with FUD. AsJerry Kaplan points out in his book Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure, Microsofr became adept at identifying promising market niches with weak competitors. "It would closely study their products and tactics, then launch an attack on their position with a strong product and aggressive pricing. Sometimes, Microsofr would propose some form of cooperation orjoint development, to learn about the marker before staging its own entry. This was the corporate version of the cheetah's hunting technique: keep a close eye on your prey, sneakup, then outrun it."

    In the sixties, we learned that in communist Russia, you could have only one kind
    of car or washing machine-the kind manufactured by the state. With no
    competition, the state-run factories churned out products that were faulty
    and drab. No Calvin Kleinjeans, no Guccis. Rock 'n' roll was not allowed on
    the radio (if you could even get a radio).


    Communist Russia and Microsoft have at least one thing in common:
    an agenda for world domination. Any organized effort to diminish Microsoft's
    power in the industry is met with overpowering force. There are numerous
    examples, bur the case that achieved the most notoriety was the Netscape
    stomp.


    __________________________________________

    Ah just pretty long, let me stop here.

  • #2
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,665
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
    I imagine that the gist of that is old news to anyone inclined to care.

  • #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    592
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Posters
    I imagine that the gist of that is old news to anyone inclined to care.
    but Not everyone has thoroughly known it,esp the Windows users.
    Last edited by iota; 07-10-2006 at 11:32 AM.

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,665
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
    Not everyone needs to thoroughly know it.
    I doubt that anyone other than some technology historians and business prosecutors actually need to thoroughly know it.

    Most people don't give a damn and it's not necessarily the case that they should.
    So long as MS products do what they want at that time, they're satisfied.

    It might grate on some others that MS has some extremely questionable business practices, but few outside of the IT/tech/web development world wants to spend time asking those questions.
    Last edited by Bill Posters; 07-10-2006 at 12:06 PM.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •