Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    IE 7 possibly not supporting full CSS?

    http://www.microsoft-watch.com/artic...1776290,00.asp

    quote:
    "Partner sources say Microsoft is wavering on the extent to which it plans to support CSS2 with IE 7.0. Developers have been clamoring for Microsoft to update its CSS support to support the latest W3C standards for years. But Microsoft is leaning toward adding some additional CSS2 support to IE 7.0, but not embracing the standard in its entirety, partners say."

    Great.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #2
    Daf
    Daf is offline
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    140
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    I had heard some talk about this, too.

    I just don't understand their relunctance to develope/market a fully compliant browser.

    Does it conflict with some features they want to include with the browser? Do they think they have a better schema for the "ultimate" browser and the W3C standards "be damned"? Is it just too much work to whip that POS browser into shape?

    I just don't get it...

    Daf

  • #3
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Reading between the lines, it seems pretty clear the IE7 will make no serious inroads in standards support. Why don't they? Well why would they? Interoperability undermines their core business model.

    What seems likely is what happened with MSN - adding support for the selectors we currently use to feed styles away from IE, but not fixing any of the bugs that we do that for.
    "Why bother with accessibility? ... Because deep down you know that the web is attractive to people who aren't exactly like you." - Joe Clark

  • #4
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Have a look at the latest entry on IE Blog.

    There's some interesting talk in the initial post, followed by many (often repeated) requests for various features.

  • #5
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant Palin
    Have a look at the latest entry on IE Blog.

    There's some interesting talk in the initial post, followed by many (often repeated) requests for various features.
    The above article was after the IE post -- I think that's what sparked the article to search for users.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Bad news. Looks like Microsoft will not be fully implementing CSS2.

    Microsoft Watch

    One partner said that Microsoft considers CSS2 to be a "flawed" standard and that the company is waiting for a later point release, such as CSS2.1 or CSS3, before throwing its complete support behind it.
    Yeah, right!

    Sources claiming familiarity with Microsoft's IE 7.0 plans said the company will add some additional CSS2 support to its new standalone browser.

    But Microsoft isn't planning to go the whole way and make IE 7.0 fully CSS2 compliant, sources said.

  • #7
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    codegoboom@yahoo.com
    Posts
    999
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Shoot, does any browser even fully implement HTML?
    *this message will self destruct in n-seconds*

  • #8
    Senior Coder JamieR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,161
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    I don't think Microsoft are too interested in web standards
    I would like to see full implementation of everything that firefox support, i.e. XML, XHTML/ CSS (FULL) etc....

    Btw, codegoboom - firefox implements html better than ievil does, or atleast I think so

  • #9
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    near Oswestry
    Posts
    4,508
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    You know what ... we're all wasting our time getting even vaguely excited about IE7. It's not gonna be much better - that's obvious from what MS are not saying.

    If it were to be CSS2 and XHTML compliant they would have made a ridiculous fuss about that by now, and milked it for every ounce of credibility; but far from it, we're not even getting straight answers from the people running the blogs that claim to want to know what customers want ....

    The whole excercise is utterly vacuous; and what little information is coming our way is like an employer's reference - what they're not saying says far more than what they are

    Either they're so lost in their own arrogance that they don't even see it anymore .. or they're doing it deliberately as a viral-marketing strategy, to get people talking positively about a new version of IE ... instead of being terrified like we should ..
    Last edited by brothercake; 03-17-2005 at 07:25 PM.
    "Why bother with accessibility? ... Because deep down you know that the web is attractive to people who aren't exactly like you." - Joe Clark

  • #10
    Senior Coder gsnedders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,340
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    If it at least supports the XML declaration in XHTML, while keeping in standards mode, I'll be happy...

  • #11
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I gotta say, even though I understand both arguements pro and con, I have been seriously debating bringing back the 'to hell with bad browsers' and blocking out IE from many of my sites. I don't feel a need to support them anymore, in anyway -- I know it's arrogant to block a user out from their choice of surfing method -- but I'm just tired of it.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #12
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,963
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Brady: "Calm blue ocean, calm blue ocean..."
    I (regrettably) agree with brothercake -- it's going to suck marginally less than IE6, if we're lucky.

    At they've pretty much confirmed 32-bit PNG support.

    I take no responsibility for the above nonsense.


    Left Justified

  • #13
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,192
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    whats annoying me is that it says it only works on xpSP2 (which i really dont want for all the crap its put on 2 of the computers here).. so. im sticking to SP1.. and i cant use IE7... yea.. great marketing

    i use firefox at the moment but it seems that when i write sites for IE, firefox annoys me, and when iwrite for FF, IE annoys me.. in the end i usually end up writing table inside table inside table .. etc... to get it to all line up properly

    as for the speed argument i see absolutely no noticable difference... is it more noticable for dial up users? does it just use compression methods like onspeed? (which says SOME files are faster, and the faster your actual speed is, the less improvement it makes)

    one thing that annoys me about firefox is the javascript, eg i cant get my head around getting onkeydown events, i can get it in every browser appart from firefox (which is just NN5 so i dont know why i can get nn4 and nn6 working but not ff.. thats what happens when companies split off i suppose)
    theres probably a really simple way of doing it, but i cant work it out oh well, if i wanted to ask i wuda posted in the javascript forum

  • #14
    Senior Coder chilipie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Shrewsbury, UK Age: 16
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bradyj
    I have been seriously debating bringing back the 'to hell with bad browsers' and blocking out IE from many of my sites.
    I disagree. Many people are stuck with IE whether they like it or not: particularly when using public computers (ie. schools, universities, cyber-cafes etc.). However, I think it would be reasonable not to bother using hacks for IE: if it works - fine, if not, tough s***. Perhaps we should display messages (with conditional comments) telling the user why it looks crap, and what they can do about it. I don't think we should block IE users; and even though we should be working towards more accessible websites, we can still provide text-only versions, right?

  • #15
    jkd
    jkd is offline
    Senior Coder jkd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    metro DC
    Posts
    3,163
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chilipie
    I disagree. Many people are stuck with IE whether they like it or not: particularly when using public computers (ie. schools, universities, cyber-cafes etc.).
    There is an installation of Firefox on every single computer in every computing cluster at Brown University. (that = lots of computers). They even launch Firefox on startup, circumventing someone from clicking on the blue E sitting on the desktop (in the Windows clusters).

    Anyhoo, this was *slightly* before my time (I remember catching the tail end of it), but there was a highly successful "I want my MTV"-campaign back when MTV was MTV and people were trying to convince cable companies to pick it up.

    Shameless plagiarism might not be a bad idea.


  •  
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •