Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    UmeŚ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts

    Lindows vs Windows

    Anyone seen this <http://www.lin---s.com/>?
    How silly can Microsoft get?
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards

  • #2
    Senior Coder Nightfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 48 Times in 48 Posts
    Care to explain? I don't have adobe installed

  • #3
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Basically M$ is saying that people will confuse LindowsOS with Windows and that Lindows.com has to destroy all copies of LindowsOS.
    OracleGuy

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,963
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Important Notice! Sorry, pending our appeal visitors from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg are not permitted to access our website or purchase our products.
    Yeah, but I'm in Australia and they won't let me in either?....

    I take no responsibility for the above nonsense.


    Left Justified

  • #5
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    UmeŚ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts
    Oh, the difference is, if you try to reach <http://lindows.com/> from one of the benelux countries, you will be redirected to that site. If you from Australia tries to reach it, you will.
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    545
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I am with MS on this. Lindows is using the "Windows" name to market themselves.

  • #7
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Kansas City, Kansas
    Posts
    1,518
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Hey I say they should take advantage of Microsoft's popularity as much as possible

  • #8
    raf
    raf is offline
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    6,589
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Apparently, Billy Boy is auditioning at the moment for a few ididots that confuse the free downloadable open source OS Lindows.com with Windows (needs no introduction).
    Are you up to the challenge ?

    Meanwhile the european community announced yesterday that Microsoft will be convicted for abusing its Windows monopoly to distribute Windows Media Player.
    And will be prohibited to distribute an OS with a buidl in searchengine.

    It's a strange world that we live in...
    I don't care what Windows integrates in their OS's and wether they gain world dominance, or if LindowsOS is basking in the reflected Windows-glory. I don't need politicians to interfere with what runs on my machine or to protectect me from whatever and guaranty my freedom of choice and what other nonsens.
    Anyone that is intrested enough in what software runs on his machine, has a very large amount of free software to choose from.
    And that wount disappear because you aparently can prohibit people to use a similar name (I believe there's also macrosoft, midisoft, minisoft, etc)
    Posting guidelines I use to see if I will spend time to answer your question : http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

  • #9
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Wichita
    Posts
    3,880
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Actually MS probably could care less about Lindows if it wasn't for the legal requirement that they must aggressively pursue anything that even looks similar to their trademark or risk losing the right to that trademark altogether. Trademark law is pretty messy, an ideal situation for keeping lawyers busy (wanna guess who wrote the trademark laws ).

    The EU's finding MS a monopolist for bundling Media Player is just as laughable as the US finding MS a monopolist for bundling IE. In both cases the alternatives to the MS application really stank during the time the abuses supposedly occured (not the situation today) and yet that seems to carry no weight in the courts.

    If Netscape had been producing a good browser instead of endless re-releases of that lousy Netscape 4.x browser they wouldn't have had near as much trouble maintaining a presense in the market.

    Likewise, I've always hated it when I was forced to use RealPlayer since the video was always tiny, low quality and surrounded by unwanted advertisements. Quicktime was usually better but the people at Apple have the foolish thought that the interface to their application ought to perform like it were running on a Mac instead of conforming to the interface conventions used by Windows (shades of the same reason why we tell people not to mess with how the browser works here) so their application has always been difficult for Windows users. In both cases those applications install useless little tray icons and of course not so tiny, useless background applications.
    Check out the Forum Search. It's the short path to getting great results from this forum.

  • #10
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Originally posted by Roy Sinclair
    Likewise, I've always hated it when I was forced to use RealPlayer since the video was always tiny, low quality and surrounded by unwanted advertisements. Quicktime was usually better but the people at Apple have the foolish thought that the interface to their application ought to perform like it were running on a Mac instead of conforming to the interface conventions used by Windows (shades of the same reason why we tell people not to mess with how the browser works here) so their application has always been difficult for Windows users. In both cases those applications install useless little tray icons and of course not so tiny, useless background applications.
    I agree. I use Windows Media Player, and I will admit I like it. It is pretty nice, epsecially how you can minimize it and then turn it into a toolbar on your start bar. Then have a little video window open in the corner for whatever it is your watching. Since use my tv tuner card to record lots of TV, that feature is really nice for watching recorded video while working.
    OracleGuy

  • #11
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,469
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Sinclair
    Quicktime was usually better but the people at Apple have the foolish thought that the interface to their application ought to perform like it were running on a Mac instead of conforming to the interface conventions used by Windows (shades of the same reason why we tell people not to mess with how the browser works here) so their application has always been difficult for Windows users. In both cases those applications install useless little tray icons and of course not so tiny, useless background applications.
    That's because Mac users think Windows is ugly, and graphics matter to us ... but, hey, you've got iTunes now.

    Has anyone here ever used Lindows? I'd be interested to know their thoughts -- if it's really a blatant rip, not just in looks and market.
    // Art is what you can get away with. <-- Andy Warhol
    ...:.:::: bradyjfrey.com : htmldog : ::::.:...

  • #12
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Microsoft should just lay off. Obviously many people aren't using Lindows. M$ just wants to over all possible competition. 21st century vertical consolidation.
    [ kSanders ] || [ PHP.net ] || [ PostgreSQL ] || [ RTFM!! ] || [ Slackware ]
    "Once you go slack, you never go back"
    "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds

  • #13
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    217
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Has anyone here ever used Lindows? I'd be interested to know their thoughts -- if it's really a blatant rip, not just in looks and market.
    I'v used it before, it looks like linux and sort of works like windows.
    I geuss you would call it windows and linux mixed together (look at the name) with some windows screen savers.
    there is a bunch of other stuff that lindows has ript M$ on.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •