Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Mozilla Sucks?

  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Mozilla Sucks?

    Mozilla sucks. I've dealt with their development team first head. They believe there browser is better than anything. They actually believe the browser "war" is still going on and they can win. It's bloatwear, firebird is small but the rendering isn't that great. Worst of all the interfaces are horrible. Even some of the team members ditch on their own product in their weblog. The interface is made up of XML and it's slow. XML was not designed for thosands of lines and is slow. IE is also more stable. It's just for linux kiddies and that small nitch crowd. IE is probably the best product that Microsoft made. It's by far more stable that any browser I've ever used. As a web developer that works with Macromedia Adobe I think I qualify to pass judgement.

    That group just doesn't get it. They don't seem to understand what consumers needs. it's nothing but a geek browser, for nerds. I'm so over being cool by using the alternative.
    Someone posted that on my site. I was just wondering how many people agree with anything he's saying here.

    Personally I can't imagine why anyone would hate Mozilla. Maybe the suite is slow, but firebird is mighty fast for me... And he said the renderer isn't very good?

  • #2
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    345
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Well, that's another opinion. The only thing I don't like about Mozilla is the response time. If a tab is busy I cannot access to it so I have to wait for the browser to read. I love Opera though. The rest of my family use IE and they will never change that. IE's icon is their door to Internet and I have given up trying to show them the others. They just don't like changes. They get lost.

  • #3
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I found the transition from IE to Firebird extremely easy. After I installed 2 extentions (the "copy image to clipboard" one, and the "middle click drops the anchor for scrolling like IE does" one) I was set.

    Response times I suppose could be a problem. I don't seem to experience it. When they're loading I can still click the tab and see the half-loading... I use FB 0.6.1 though.

  • #4
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Umeċ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts
    Well, I doubt he's dealt with their development first hand, as they are a really large project. He might have dealt with a couple of individual developers, and that's all.

    He's right about most of them believing their browser is better than anything, but they aren't the ones to glorify it either. They are comparing their browser to the others (iew, iem, op, saf) as well as with many different xml user agents (Too many to mention) and they are aware of most of the faults of their browser. Taken altogether, though, I think they're right in their assessment. Their browser is the best when it comes to all factors weighed together, although maybe not when it comes to specific factors. And they are continually trying to improve it, in difference to a company that I shouldn't need to mention the name of...

    As for them believing that the browser war is not over, they're pretty disillusioned when it comes to this. They know they will have a hard time to achieve anywhere near the percentages nn2-4 had in it's glory days. However, the browser war ISN'T over, or they wouldn't be here at all. Apple wouldn't be making their own browser if they thought Microsoft had already won it. Opera would not be able to stay in business if the war was lost. Those browsers being in existence is the proof that the war isn't over.

    As for the browser (the suite at least) being bloatware, yes it is. Even more so, I'd say iew is, however. Well, the mozilla suite is bloated, but it contains lots of tools, especially for the web developer. It's really powerful in it's diversity and it's capabilities. You can find everything you want the browser to have in the suite, when you happen to need it.

    As for the interface, yes, it's not as good as if could be. But it's better than iem, iew, saf and opera for the most part. In this, the suite is actually somewhat better than the birds, at least for cross platform compatibility and consistency. The thing is, to get the most out of the interface, you must change a few things from the default, whereas the said browsers are all better configured "from the box", or whatever equivalent you say for downloads. That their own developers ditch it in their blogs is not different from the way the other browsers are. They don't diss' the browser as much as point out weak points. As I mentioned, they know there are faults in their product, and what they are doing is that they are trying to point the things out to the other developers and the testing population so that they can maybe see a change in it. That's a kind of feedback that is common in opensource development but practically nonexistant in corporate environments. It's feedback that people from the outside can take part in. And it's foreign to many people used to the Microsoft way, which is why many react on it in a way that was not intended.

    The interface being made up by xml is correct, and it IS slower than using some of the system built-in structures. But it's cross platform and it's far from so slow that it really matters. He's wrong about xml being not designed for thousands of lines even though he's right about xml being slow, but that slowness lies in the file format and not in the actual internal representation, and it's the internal representation that determines the speed. Rather, it's the XUL-XBL-JavaScript combinations and the multiple usage hooks that slow the UI down. (The UI has become very much faster since 1.0, and I'd say you can't feel the XML/JS slowness any more except for a few very special cases.)

    As for iew being more stable, I'd say that is bull****. I can crash his iew anytime, using bugs reported for ie5w that has not yet been resolved. True, I can crash moz too, but that's because I have access, like everyone else, to the bugzilla database. The stable releases of moz (those without any letters after the version number) are no less stable than iew from my experience. And they don't take the os with them when they go down, like iew can do on the win9x operative systems. And, my browser doesn't allow viri and trojans to get inside without even notifying me. If I open a file that's infected, it's my fault, but in iew, it may get opened without my knowing it. (Using security holes provided by various integration features of iew, or the google bar security problem if people haven't updated.)

    As for iew being the best product Microsoft ever made, that's a highly subjective thing that I won't say anything about. It might be, it might not be, depending on what products you use.

    About him qualifying to pass judgement: <http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...authority.html> (That's not saying I could come up with a better arguments for it myself...)


    In general, I think he's got it wrong. All the browsers are produced more or less by nerds. The difference is that moz being open, it shows. Some computer users revere nerds, some have their prejudices about them. That shows in his last comment, which also seems to indicate that you use moz because "using the alternative" is cool. Most of us use it because we prefer it for one of many reasons. (I could also use <http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.html> and point out that the way he generalises in the last paragraph kinda takes away his credibility when it comes to the first paragraph.)
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards

  • #5
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    frankfurt, german banana republic
    Posts
    1,848
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The "Macromedia Adobe" part is actually quite funny, and I read it as "I need to use Dreamweaver to create webpages because I don't get HTML". Indeed it qualifies him to exactly nothing, and is a logical error in his argument. Just dismiss his opinion.
    De gustibus non est disputandum.

  • #6
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Umeċ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts
    Well, now how do you know he doesn't speak about flash and acrobat (well, bloody likely...)? And is everyone using Dreamweaver a less competent web designer if thaqt was the program he was referring to?

    You know that impressions of competence levels shouldn't be the whole ground for dismissing a person's argument, since you might be wrong in your impression.



    That said, I would ignore him as a nobody without much real knowledge or insight.
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards

  • #7
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    For me, Dreamweaver's more of a time-saver than a life-saver.

    I think Macromedia Adobe is meant to be Flash though? Maybe not, since Flash isn't exactly browser-dependant.

    Hopefully he writes back with clarification.

  • #8
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    frankfurt, german banana republic
    Posts
    1,848
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Originally posted by liorean
    Well, now how do you know he doesn't speak about flash and acrobat (well, bloody likely...)? And is everyone using Dreamweaver a less competent web designer if thaqt was the program he was referring to?
    I don't know exactly what he meant, that's why I wrote how I read (i.e. which impression I got from) his statement. And of course not everyone using DW is incompetent. I didn't say that. But using this info to strengthen one's argument by impyling it's from a "professional" strikes me as odd.

    You know that impressions of competence levels shouldn't be the whole ground for dismissing a person's argument, since you might be wrong in your impression.
    ACK. It was more the whole post that made me dismiss it. The "linux kiddies" were a nice flamebait too, on which I could have expanded.
    De gustibus non est disputandum.

  • #9
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    I could go rip the thing apart too but liorean pretty much summed it up for me.

    Although I don't know if English is this guys first language (I kinda hope not), if it is and his ability to properly construct sentences is any indication, he is just some cocky smacktard.

    I'd sure like to see some of the stuff this "professional" web designer made.
    OracleGuy

  • #10
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    34° 54' N 82° 13' W
    Posts
    996
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Anyone who thinks mozilla sucks is off their rocker. They must like IE having to be restarted every 45 seconds...
    Stevie Peele
    Neverside IRC Network - irc.veonex.net | tc.tutorialnetwork.org
    #dev - any programming,etc. question
    #design - design discussion and critque
    #central - general chat
    Come join us!

  • #11
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Honestly, I've never had any problems with IE being unstable.

    Mozilla's crashed on me a few times, but it's still a much better browser.

  • #12
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Umeċ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts
    IE's stability is like the general windows stability. It depends on how many programs you have installed, what hardware you have, what drivers you use for that hardware, what programs are running, and on what plugins you have installed. A clean install almost never causes any problems, but see how stable your system is after you have installed a few hundred programs. (Of which you maybe use 20 anyway...)
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards

  • #13
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    paris, france
    Posts
    1,216
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    i wouldnt say mozilla sucks but i find it is overhyped
    photoshop too expensive? use the GIMP! www.gimp.org

  • #14
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,223
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The more hype there is, the better its chances at becoming #1.

  • #15
    Master Coder
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Umeċ, Sweden
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 74 Posts
    Personally, I think Mozilla is clearly underhyped. Nearly nobody outside the web design business (that I've talked to) knows about it.
    liorean <[lio@wg]>
    Articles: RegEx evolt wsabstract , Named Arguments
    Useful Threads: JavaScript Docs & Refs, FAQ - HTML & CSS Docs, FAQ - XML Doc & Refs
    Moz: JavaScript DOM Interfaces MSDN: JScript DHTML KDE: KJS KHTML Opera: Standards


  •  
    Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •