Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: TLD suffixes

  1. #1
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    2,318
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 304 Times in 303 Posts

    TLD suffixes

    Doesn't exactly seem the smartest of ideas, IMHO.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...rZdH_blog.html

  • #2
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Agreed, it seems like a bad idea. However ICANN will make a butt load of money which is probably the driving reason behind this.
    OracleGuy

  • #3
    Mega-ultimate member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Winona, MN - The land of 10,000 lakes
    Posts
    1,855
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 45 Times in 42 Posts
    Anyone want to get together and go in for .vom ???

  • #4
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    2,318
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 304 Times in 303 Posts
    It'd take a fair few ten bobs to save up for one of those.

  • #5
    UE Antagonizer Fumigator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Utah, USA, Northwestern hemisphere, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Alpha Quadrant
    Posts
    7,691
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 637 Times in 625 Posts
    ICANN is insisting the registration fee and yearly fee will barely cover administrative costs and the inevitable legal wrangling that is sure to occur.

    I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt-- it did take them 6 years to agree to the final draft, after all. Hopefully during those 6 years they've come up with a good way to administer this craziness.

    I'm also kind of excited about the idea that these lame domain hoarders are going to see their inventory's value drop to near zero. I won't need your goodtimes.com, thank you very much-- I'll just take goodtimes.usa (or whatever). They'll never be able to monopolize EVERY suffix now.

  • #6
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    2,318
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 304 Times in 303 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fumigator View Post
    I'm also kind of excited about the idea that these lame domain hoarders are going to see their inventory's value drop to near zero. I won't need your goodtimes.com, thank you very much-- I'll just take goodtimes.usa (or whatever). They'll never be able to monopolize EVERY suffix now.
    That is one possible benefit, although how much it will realistically affect them remains to be seen. The old suffixes, especially the original eight?, have been around so long now that a lot of people still class those as the ones to have.

    It would have been a lot better if they just put some effort into sorting the speculators out rather than allowing trashy extensions, IMHO.

  • #7
    UE Antagonizer Fumigator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Utah, USA, Northwestern hemisphere, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Alpha Quadrant
    Posts
    7,691
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 637 Times in 625 Posts
    Yes but there's really no way to judge a legit ownership vs. a placeholder ownership. That's a level of censorship I wouldn't be comfortably with, even if it did solve a problem I find to be extremely annoying.

    The big suffixes are only "the ones to have" because public perception has been those are the only ones out there. Once the dummies-- er, the public sector realizes there can be any kind of name for a website, I think the stranglehold on dot COM will grow weak. But as you point out, it all remains to be seen. People are creatures of habit, repetition, and followers of the alpha dog, after all. Look at Facebook for the best (and saddest) example of this.

    If I had more balls I'd invest into a common suffix name, hoping it gets popular and sells a lot of domains, from which I'd get a slice. 185 investors into a suffix is pretty reasonable.


  •  

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •