Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
05-30-2011, 03:25 AM #1
I posted (a while back) a post that some of my posts (even though they were under the time-frame) were unable to be edited (at all) and could thus not be made resolved.
1) what level of importance do you place on marking resolved threads as such?
2) I assume I should just contact the Mods of the forum, but the question is does the importance of resolving outweigh your non-desire for PM's saying "hey i have a post i cannot resolve named '_' posted '_' " ?
05-30-2011, 04:40 AM #2
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Florida, USA
- Thanked 406 Times in 398 Posts
I believe the general consensus is change your thread to resolved if you can, and if not don't stress over it. I sometimes changed them myself, but it's more of a courtesy to other posters than a requirement.
05-30-2011, 05:17 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Redmond, WA
- Thanked 100 Times in 94 Posts
^ This. Though I completely understand, and agree, with your statement that Resolved titles make responding to threads much easier.
If you ever are unable to mark a post as resolved and would like it to be in the Server Side forums I'm more than happy to help you out.
Unless otherwise stated, any code posted is most likely untested and may contain syntax errors.
My posts, comments, code, and suggestions reflect only my personal views.
Web Portfolio and Code Snippets: http://shanechism.com
05-30-2011, 05:58 AM #4
k thanx seemes like it pends on mod... not having issue anymore (as i am going in and am able to resolve them)-- and if i do ill just let it go unless mod inquires
EDIT: LOL it just happened so this thread can be resolved (I can't resolve it although I can edit it o.O