Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    553
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Windows 2000 pro vs XP pro?

    Can anyone comment on the relative merits of xp pro vs windows 2000 pro, or know where there is a review?

    G

  • #2
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    I personally prefer Win2k Pro over WinXP Pro. Win2k is more proven and has a lot less security holes in it compared to WinXP. I wouldn't consider getting WinXP until the first Service Pack comes out.

    WinXP might have a little better compatibilty with 9x only applications however you need to also make sure that all your hardware is supported by WinXP or there are new drivers from the manufacter. More hardware has drivers for Win2k since it has been around longer.

    I don't really know of any comparison review. Try searching Google or something.

  • #3
    jkd
    jkd is offline
    Senior Coder jkd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    metro DC
    Posts
    3,163
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
    I've never used Win2k extensively, but it has to be better than WinXP Pro.

    I've never needed 9x compatibility, I disable all the new GUI stuff, and kill half the services. Which leaves me with a Win2k essentially.

    I've never had any problems with hardware support in WinXP though. I plugin a cd-burner, "AOpen 24x CD-R/RW detected" and it installs drivers. I plug in my Logitech gamepad, finds it an installs drivers. I plug in a new winmodem, it detects it and installs drivers. Etc...

    The *only* thing it never found in its own driver database was nForce drivers, but a simply popping in the included cd with my mobo and I was set.

    So... one thing I do like about WinXP Pro is its hardware detection - though I don't know how it compares to Win2k.

  • #4
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Win2k has pretty good driver detection. Yeah with WinXP Pro you gotta go through and disable services and that are turned on by default like Terminal Serivces that allows someone to access your computer over the internet.

  • #5
    Supreme Overlord Spookster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Marion, IA USA
    Posts
    6,273
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 83 Times in 82 Posts
    I use 2000 at work and XP at home. My XP machine blows 2000 away. I like it much better.
    Spookster
    CodingForums Supreme Overlord
    All Hail Spookster

  • #6
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    574
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I have XP Home Edition on my Inspiron (regreably, wish I'd sprung for XP Pro ), but I've used both Win2k and XP Pro. I would go with XP pro personally. If you want to compare the two, you can do so here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ ... some pretty useful links and information that might help you make your decision .
    boxer_1
    CodingForums Moderator
    "How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?"

  • #7
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    WinXP has better DVD playback support, if you do any of that.

  • #8
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    553
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks everyone! Sppokseter, when you say,
    My XP machine blows 2000 away
    I assume you mean XP pro? In what respect specifically is it better?... I had heard issues with XP that any time you add a device on XP, you have to go through some XP driven registration process. Is this a non-issue?

    G

  • #9
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    XP driven registration process?

    Are you on about drivers that have been tested and digitaly signed by Microsoft and when you try installing a driver that isn't digitaly signed by Microsoft its start blabbing at you that the driver hasn't been digitaly signed by Microsoft do you want to continue.

    Is that what you meant?

    Because you don't have to get the driver tested and signed you can take the risk and continue installing.

    And normaly for me when I add a new piece of hardware its just a simple matter of installing the correct driver to get it all working.

    I have never really had a problem with adding new hardware and installing their drivers, maybe someone else has had a different experience.

  • #10
    Rockstar Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,074
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 328 Times in 324 Posts
    Your quite the thread digger, aren't ya?
    OracleGuy

  • #11
    New Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Do you meen I'm a thread digger?

  • #12
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    If you have RAM >= 256 then go for WinXP. Its the Best ....

    But Less RAM then Windows 2000 PROF Rocks....

    Digits
    Last edited by oracleguy; 05-30-2009 at 06:56 PM.

  • #13
    Senior Coder
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Wichita
    Posts
    3,880
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Go for Windows XP unless you've got a specific reason for 2K. Contrary to a previously voiced opinion, XP is more secure than 2K and with the soon to be released SP2 it will be even more so. That doesn't mean it's totally secure or even modestly secure, only that it's improving. XP is the latest desktop OS from MS so unless you've got a compelling reason to use an older desktop OS you really should get the current one.
    Check out the Forum Search. It's the short path to getting great results from this forum.

  • #14
    Regular Coder
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Carmel California
    Posts
    471
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I used to not like xp and would say 2k, but as the many updates have come I say xp. XP used to be terrible in compatibility and had many odd quirks, but with the many updates that has come I say xp (even more so with sp2 coming out). Ive seen some weird quirks with 2k (updated), that Ive never seen on xp sp1 (updated). Xp too me seems to be much more "inteligent" with the registry and the gui these days. Xp also has much better working compatibility features then the early days of xp.
    Kris Hubby
    kwhubby site

  • #15
    New to the CF scene
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I just installed windows 2000 Pro SP4 on a P3 256mb ram laptop with a N wireless card. I never used Windows 2000 before. Just 98 and XP pro. BTW, I have a machine running on Vista U and Windows 7 RC. Look like I have most Windows OSs in my house now.
    Today: 05-29-2009.


  •  
    Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •