...

http://funkonline.shyper.com/

XSL
09-17-2004, 11:08 PM
http://funkonline.shyper.com/ - What do you think?

hemebond
09-17-2004, 11:55 PM
Your XHTML doesn't validate; your pages are sent as text/html; inline styles; font tags; non-semantic markup; lists not used where necessary; no seperation between structure/data and presentation and tables used for layoutLooks pants in Firefox.

gsnedders
09-18-2004, 12:01 AM
I'll add looks pants in Safari, does this mean it's a site which only looks as intended in a browser which has only been updated once this millenium...

Now, replace text/html in the Meta tag with <?php
$mime = "text/html";
if(stristr($_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],"application/xhtml+xml")) {
if(preg_match("/application\/xhtml\+xml;q=([01]|0\.\d{1,3}|1\.0)/i",$_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],$matches)) {
$xhtml_q = $matches[1];
if(preg_match("/text\/html;q=q=([01]|0\.\d{1,3}|1\.0)/i",$_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],$matches)) {
$html_q = $matches[1];
if((float)$xhtml_q >= (float)$html_q) {
$mime = "application/xhtml+xml";
}
}
} else {
$mime = "application/xhtml+xml";
}
}
echo $mime;
?>

XSL
09-18-2004, 12:16 AM
What does that do?

btw, I am just learning. At least my CSS validates :o

The weird thing is, I am using Firefox and it looks fine for me. (1.0 pr)

mindlessLemming
09-18-2004, 12:17 AM
Now, replace text/html in the Meta tag with ....

..but delete the 'fix_code' function - it isn't being used.

**edit: "What does that do?"
---------------
It is a PHP script that detects whether the User Agent (browser) is capable of handling true XHTML - XHTML served with a content-type of application/xhtml+xml. Those that are, get XHTML. The others (IE) get it sent to them how you're doing it now.
Issue: XHTML served properly MUST be well formed. Well formed doesn't just mean proper nesting and closing of tags, either. It means all url's that contain query strings need the ampersand encoded (&amp; instead of just & ) and no copy/paste from MS Word or similar as their 'smart quotes' are invalid and will give users the Yellow Screen of Death.

XSL
09-18-2004, 12:21 AM
what does it do?

**Edit Thanks

mindlessLemming
09-18-2004, 12:26 AM
we're playing question/answer leap-frog. See **edit in post above :)

XSL
09-18-2004, 03:20 PM
Ok. I put that in. Did I put it in the right place?

**Edit: Wait. You can't see PHP. So that question is unanswerable. Is this right:

<meta http-equiv="EXPIRES" content="0" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="<?php
$mime = "text/html";
if(stristr($_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],"application/xhtml+xml")) {
if(preg_match("/application\/xhtml\+xml;q=([01]|0\.\d{1,3}|1\.0)/i",$_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],$matches)) {
$xhtml_q = $matches[1];
if(preg_match("/text\/html;q=q=([01]|0\.\d{1,3}|1\.0)/i",$_SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"],$matches)) {
$html_q = $matches[1];
if((float)$xhtml_q >= (float)$html_q) {
$mime = "application/xhtml+xml";
}
}
} else {
$mime = "application/xhtml+xml";
}
}
echo $mime;
?> ; charset=iso-8859-1" />

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="sheet.css" media="all" />
</head>

ReadMe.txt
09-19-2004, 03:45 PM
so what browsers does it look right in?

I looked in IE6 and Moz1.8a3. They render it completely differently and neither of them look right.

XSL
09-19-2004, 07:00 PM
I dunno. It works in Firefox 1.0 pr for me.

AaronW
09-20-2004, 12:58 AM
Well I'm at 1600x1200 and it's quite clear that this design was designed for a specific resolution and a maximized window. What resolution that is exactly, I don't know... I'm going to guess 1152x864 but I dunno for sure.

tsguitar2004
09-20-2004, 04:49 AM
The site does not look good in IE6/pc. The content area of the blog, where the actual entries are, is too wide to fit next to the left sidebar, so IE just drops all those entires to the bottom of the screen, beneath the left sidebar. I think it has to do with your widths bein percentages, but there is never a pixel declaration for those areas to be percentages of. 99.8% of *what*? Just a guess, but try to put a width into the body CSS declarations, something like a pixel or em width, and see if that fixes the trouble.

The design holds in NS7.1/pc, except there is plenty of white space at the bottom of the screen. Even going to the comments on the entries, where there is a scroll bar, there is a big white space at the bottom of the screen in NS. Also, the design fails when I shrink the window. Seems like you created this site to fit 1024x768, but anything less than that and it doesn't work. Look into a liquid design for the site so it will work no matter the resolution.

Also, you don't have a background color declared for the body. You will want to change that, probably. Someone else on here said that the default background on his screen is a bright orange. Think of how awful that would look with your design...
-ts

evilregis
09-22-2004, 03:15 AM
I'm using FF 1.0PR as well and that's not working, dude. Sorry. Whatever resolution you are using is probably the only resolution it works in. What I get is as follows:

800x600

valid CSS icon pushes into the side border
blog comments area scrolls horizontally
"Funk Online Shoutbox" falls down below all content and reads as "Funk Online Shout"


1024x768

"Funk Online Shoutbox" falls down below all content but displays full image width


1600x1200

left background repeats and covers up your menu items
looks like right background repeats with right icons over top of it, looks odd
Shoutbox is to the right of all of that, in a black border, but with some right-padding, it appears
comments text isn't flowing with the width of that area


And you haven't set a background colour and I get a worthy-of-self-inflicted-eye-gouging mix of your browns/beiges with a bright cyan background.

You should really validate your HTML before posting a site for review. If it bungs up in a browser when someone sees it, that's usually the first thing you hear and it's hard to help someone along without that critical step in place.

Hope that helped.



EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum