Sparky
01-14-2004, 02:04 PM
At my current job, I have been tasked to improve some of the departments IT infrastructure. One thing I am looking at currently is the user profiles of the staff, and the way they save there files, documents and emails.
We have a Windows 2000 server, and about 20 client machines, all running 2k/xp. People log into the machines, and use the profiles stored on the local machines. They all save there files in one jumble of a shared folder on the server. This obviously results in all user settings and emails being unable to someone as soon as they log into another machine,
I have set a folder called ‘Profiles’ on the server, for peoples profiles to be stored on. I have also set another older in the same root called ‘Home folder’ for everyone to have a home folder. I am also redirecting peoples ‘My documents’ folder to the home folder.
Now, for the questions. Are roaming profiles really a good idea? Would it be an idea to move the Outlook personal files (or any other folders/files in a user’s profile) out from the profiles and either into the Home folders, or some other kind of directory? I was thinking along the lines of it being a good idea to keep the roaming profile size as small as possible to decrease login/logoff times and network traffic – other than the My Documents folder, I was thinking that the outlook personal files would be the largest in the users profile.
Also, will I have many programs (or even users!) getting confused as to the whereabouts of the ‘My Documents’ folder, and saving or moving files to somewhere in the documents and settings file of the local machine, as opposed to the assigned network space?
Finally, if I wanted to create some folders for which certain groups would be granted access for (a fair bit of work people do is relevant too more than one member of staff), would it be a good idea to include these folders in the ‘Home Folder’ folder, or create another folder in the same root as the profiles and home folder? (hope that makes sense)
Thanks in advance for the help, and please speak up if you think I have something seriously wrong, not really done the best way it could be done.
We have a Windows 2000 server, and about 20 client machines, all running 2k/xp. People log into the machines, and use the profiles stored on the local machines. They all save there files in one jumble of a shared folder on the server. This obviously results in all user settings and emails being unable to someone as soon as they log into another machine,
I have set a folder called ‘Profiles’ on the server, for peoples profiles to be stored on. I have also set another older in the same root called ‘Home folder’ for everyone to have a home folder. I am also redirecting peoples ‘My documents’ folder to the home folder.
Now, for the questions. Are roaming profiles really a good idea? Would it be an idea to move the Outlook personal files (or any other folders/files in a user’s profile) out from the profiles and either into the Home folders, or some other kind of directory? I was thinking along the lines of it being a good idea to keep the roaming profile size as small as possible to decrease login/logoff times and network traffic – other than the My Documents folder, I was thinking that the outlook personal files would be the largest in the users profile.
Also, will I have many programs (or even users!) getting confused as to the whereabouts of the ‘My Documents’ folder, and saving or moving files to somewhere in the documents and settings file of the local machine, as opposed to the assigned network space?
Finally, if I wanted to create some folders for which certain groups would be granted access for (a fair bit of work people do is relevant too more than one member of staff), would it be a good idea to include these folders in the ‘Home Folder’ folder, or create another folder in the same root as the profiles and home folder? (hope that makes sense)
Thanks in advance for the help, and please speak up if you think I have something seriously wrong, not really done the best way it could be done.