For those who care about accessibility:

[Vladdy]

I know it's sad but I can not stop laughing at it:
check out the WID site and see their page source:
http://www.wid.org/ - current site
http://www.wid.org/index.php4 - their "improved" version

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

playing devil's advocate: if WID thinks their site is ACCESSIBLE ENOUGH, why should the rest of us worry :confused: :confused: :D :D

[firepages]

.. thats what happens when peeps start developing in 'standards compliant' browsers , i.e. it does not work properly for 90% + of Internet users .... but it is valid code ;)

[Roy Sinclair]

HTML Tidy doesn't think it's valid code, however it is more valid than their older code.

[Vladdy]

Yeah, but have you tried running them through the Bobby that they claim approves their layouts?
Their new version has THREE levels of nested tables :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[Roy Sinclair]

I hadn't but after doing so it sure looks to me like they ought to pull their Bobby logo.

[cg9com]

Originally posted by firepages
.. thats what happens when peeps start developing in 'standards compliant' browsers , i.e. it does not work properly for 90% + of Internet users .... but it is valid code ;)
I think that it will work with more than that, if in fact it actually is decent markup.

ps: Vladdy I like the sig. lol