Website test -- tell me what you think, and if you find any errors

[bradyj]

I popped up my test website here for the ol' company, tell me what you think, and if you notice any errors that I overlooked. There will still be minor changes to the graphics and what have you, but it's the code and the scripts I worry over.

Thanks!!

BelAire Displays (http://www.dotfive.com/belairedisplays/index.html)

[duniyadnd]

Can't find any errors. Like the layout. Looks real nice. Can maybe play around with the pull down menus a little bit with css.

Duniyadnd

[ionsurge]

The second of the ">"s on the title page is not inline with the text in Opera - which is the only thing I can find - otherwise pretty good work bradj.


:)

[pb&j]

IE6, 800x600
just a note...

scrollbars both bottom and side.

navigation through middle kinda cool but (in products) having

more navigation along bottom may be confusing. at first i didn't see it because of the scroll bars. plus it does not show on the other product pages just the first?

site map (to me) usually means a page full of visible links to the pages, not a quick drop menu.

good images, colors and styling :thumbsup:

[bradyj]

Good points -- a note: I just put that there for a sitemap right now... didn't feel like building it until I was told exactly how many pages we were using, then I'll bust out a normal one.

I see that error in Opera... how would I get around that? It's absolute positioning via CSS?

[bradyj]

also noticed that when you go to the three main pages: products, who we are, contact

the menu at the very bottom of the page becomes jumbled when I load it in Macintosh IE 5.2... but it looks fine in IE for PC.

For that, I have no clue why it reads it differently. Any opinions are welcome about that and the Opera deal.

Thanks to everyone who posted!!

[Scylas]

the design looks really good.. I like it.. thumbs up..

[bradyj]

I took into account all of your ideas, and made a final version which is available at belairedisplays.com (http://www.belairedisplays.com) - we have already discussed a 2.0 version in the works, so it'll change soon though.

Thanks to everyone who posted and gave me advice.