View Full Version : Validating my site... it's tricky!

11-10-2008, 08:17 PM
I have never bothered to validate my sites before. I've started to think this might come handy, and everybody is recommending it. Also, I have some trouble with accessing my sites from different browsers. So, here goes:

But, when I try to validate, there are to many issues I can't manage to fix. :confused: Something with the META tag, and some are just annoying always refering to either " 's or the tags. Can anyone take a quick look. I warn you for "error-shock" :p I have been floating on air with my coding, now I really want to learn the real deep down basics of a validated file.

You may check out this file for validation:

11-10-2008, 09:05 PM
you've got no doc type for beginners
way to many large pictures on one page
iframes confuse search engines and validators
forgot <tr> & </tr> on tables

put it in the link below and post for each problem you can't figure out

11-10-2008, 09:13 PM
Thank you for answering :)

I can't understand this.

Unable to Determine Parse Mode!
No Character Encoding Found! Falling back to UTF-8.
No DOCTYPE found! Checking with default HTML 4.01 Transitional Document Type.

11-10-2008, 09:22 PM
Read this sticky on doctypes.


Also add this just before you closing </head> tag.

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

11-10-2008, 09:31 PM
Hi there ingeborgh,

and a warm welcome to these forums. ;)

I can't understand this.

It seems that at your present level of coding, page validation is beyond you. ;)

So here is your page validated.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Script-Type" content="text/javascript">


<link type="text/css" href="/layout/stylesheets/css.css" rel="stylesheet">


<table style="width:100%; height: 100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<table style="width:477px; background-color:#969696;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<td style="height:471px; background-color:#969696;">
<img src="http://ingeborgh.com/layout/headers/side12.jpg" border="0" alt="">
<td style="width: 477px; height: 471px; background-color:#969696;">
<img src="http://ingeborgh.com/layout/headers/middle2.jpg" border="0" alt="">
<td style="background-color:#969696; height: 471px;">
<img src="http://ingeborgh.com/layout/headers/side22.jpg" border="0" alt="">
<td style="width: 50px; height: 243px; background-color:#969696;" rowspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
<td style="width: 477px; height: 5px; padding-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-right: 5px; background-color:#ffffff;">
<div align="right">
<center><span class="tekst">
<a href="/webdesign.php"><span class="mini">WEBDESIGN</span></a> ⁘
<a href="/meg.php"><span class="mini">INGEBORG</span></a> ⁘
<a href="/index.php"><span class="mini">FORSIDEN</span></a> ⁘
<a href="/o"><span class="mini">ODINS SIDE</span></a> ⁘
<a href="/stubbe.php"><span class="mini">STUBBE</span></a> ⁘
<a href="2/outside.php"><span class="mini">OUTSIDE</span></a>
<td style="padding:10px; width: 477px; height: 100%; background-color:#ffffff;">
<iframe src="b" height="10700" width="100%" name="innhold" marginwidth="40" marginheight="20" scrolling="auto" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<td style="width:17px; height:243px;background-color:#969696;" rowspan="2">&nbsp;</td>


...perhaps you will be more successful with your CSS validation...
You may, also find some of these links illuminating. ;)

A better way to build your website (http://www.boagworld.com/archives/2004/06/a_better_way_to_build_your_website.html)
Why tables for layout is stupid: problems defined, solutions offered (http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/index.html)
Ten ways to speed up the download time of your web pages (http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-usability/speed-up-download-time.shtml)
Nested Tables: About the (ab)use of tables as layout tools in webpages. (http://www.dorward.me.uk/www/nested/)
Why Tables Are Bad (For Layout) Compared to Semantic HTML + CSS (http://www.phrogz.net/CSS/WhyTablesAreBadForLayout.html)
Why go table free? (http://www.workingwith.me.uk/tablefree/why/)
Why avoiding tables (for layout) is important (http://davespicks.com/essays/notables.html)


11-10-2008, 09:44 PM
Are tables really that bad :rolleyes:


I admit page valitation coding is beyond me, and appreciate your help :)

document type does not allow element "P" here; missing one of "APPLET", "OBJECT", "MAP", "IFRAME", "BUTTON" start-tag.

…serer meg for (altså ikke ex phil).<p></span>

This does not make sense. I always use
<p> as paragraphs, or paragraphdividers.

11-10-2008, 10:08 PM
Whoa! I managed to validate a site!

I notice I don't use "-s and alt="" and close tags properly. I will hereby be strict to myself when coding.

Click here to see the marvellous result! (http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fingeborgh.com%2Fmeg.php&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.591)

11-11-2008, 05:05 AM
very nice of coothead to do that...
it's probably best if the coder learns themselves
because of aerospace eng's red sig text


EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum